File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The biocompatibility of glass-fibre reinforced composites (GFRCs) – a systematic review

TitleThe biocompatibility of glass-fibre reinforced composites (GFRCs) – a systematic review
Authors
KeywordsFibre reinforced composites
Systematic review
Biocompatibility
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier Japan KK. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journalofprosthodonticresearch.com/
Citation
Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2021, v. 65 n. 3, p. 273-283 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) have received considerable attention, owing to their potential use in dental prostheses or bone fracture fixation applications. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze and report the biological properties of FRCs reported in the existing literature. Study selections: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library) was performed to identify all relevant studies published between 1962 and 2019. The search was limited to laboratory-based studies published in English. Citation mining was also performed through cross-referencing of included studies and hand searching of relevant journals. Results: A total of 1283 potentially relevant articles were initially identified, and thirty-three articles were full-text screened. In the final ten studies included for review, four investigated bacterial adhesion and growth abilities on FRCs, four investigated the fibroblastic cytotoxicity of different surface-treated FRCs, and two investigated the osseointegration between bone and FRCs. Owing to the heterogeneity of fiber types, FRC-coating, and lack of standardized testing protocols, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The included studies indicated that glass fibers, and in particular E-glass fibers, are superior to ceramics and other FRCs in terms of bacterial adherence, fibroblast cytotoxicity, and cell viability. Conclusions: Glass-fiber-reinforced composites are cytocompatible materials that possess satisfactory biological properties and can be used in dental prosthesis and craniofacial implants. Further research is necessary to regulate the matrix ion release/degradation of FRCs to prolong the initially demonstrated properties.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306872
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.135
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, T-
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JP-
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MF-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, KE-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-22T07:40:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-22T07:40:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontic Research, 2021, v. 65 n. 3, p. 273-283-
dc.identifier.issn1883-1958-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306872-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) have received considerable attention, owing to their potential use in dental prostheses or bone fracture fixation applications. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze and report the biological properties of FRCs reported in the existing literature. Study selections: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library) was performed to identify all relevant studies published between 1962 and 2019. The search was limited to laboratory-based studies published in English. Citation mining was also performed through cross-referencing of included studies and hand searching of relevant journals. Results: A total of 1283 potentially relevant articles were initially identified, and thirty-three articles were full-text screened. In the final ten studies included for review, four investigated bacterial adhesion and growth abilities on FRCs, four investigated the fibroblastic cytotoxicity of different surface-treated FRCs, and two investigated the osseointegration between bone and FRCs. Owing to the heterogeneity of fiber types, FRC-coating, and lack of standardized testing protocols, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The included studies indicated that glass fibers, and in particular E-glass fibers, are superior to ceramics and other FRCs in terms of bacterial adherence, fibroblast cytotoxicity, and cell viability. Conclusions: Glass-fiber-reinforced composites are cytocompatible materials that possess satisfactory biological properties and can be used in dental prosthesis and craniofacial implants. Further research is necessary to regulate the matrix ion release/degradation of FRCs to prolong the initially demonstrated properties.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Japan KK. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journalofprosthodonticresearch.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontic Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectFibre reinforced composites-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectBiocompatibility-
dc.titleThe biocompatibility of glass-fibre reinforced composites (GFRCs) – a systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00031-
dc.identifier.pmid34421062-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85114415588-
dc.identifier.hkuros328970-
dc.identifier.hkuros328959-
dc.identifier.volume65-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage273-
dc.identifier.epage283-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000692322500003-
dc.publisher.placeJapan-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats