File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa023
- WOS: WOS:000683377100007
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Deconstructing Dud Disarmament Disputes
| Title | Deconstructing Dud Disarmament Disputes |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2021 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jcsl.oxfordjournals.org/ |
| Citation | Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2021, v. 26 n. 1, p. 185-218 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This Article explores the limits of judicial settlement of nuclear-weapon disputes through a case study of the Marshall Islands’ cases against India, Pakistan and the UK before the International Court of Justice in 2016. It posits that judicial settlement is limited mainly by the quality of the arguments and evidence submitted by the disputants, not by any limitations inherent in judicial settlement with such politically sensitive disputes. The lawyers in the Marshall Islands’ cases should have taken greater care in crafting their arguments and in tying them explicitly to Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and its customary equivalent. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/306695 |
| ISSN | 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.153 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Fry, JD | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nair, S | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-22T07:38:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-22T07:38:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2021, v. 26 n. 1, p. 185-218 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1467-7954 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/306695 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This Article explores the limits of judicial settlement of nuclear-weapon disputes through a case study of the Marshall Islands’ cases against India, Pakistan and the UK before the International Court of Justice in 2016. It posits that judicial settlement is limited mainly by the quality of the arguments and evidence submitted by the disputants, not by any limitations inherent in judicial settlement with such politically sensitive disputes. The lawyers in the Marshall Islands’ cases should have taken greater care in crafting their arguments and in tying them explicitly to Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and its customary equivalent. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jcsl.oxfordjournals.org/ | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Conflict and Security Law | - |
| dc.title | Deconstructing Dud Disarmament Disputes | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Fry, JD: jamesfry@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Fry, JD=rp01244 | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jcsl/kraa023 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 328514 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 26 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 185 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 218 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000683377100007 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |