File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hyaluronic acid–enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

TitleHyaluronic acid–enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
Authors
KeywordsFrozen embryo transfer
Hyaluronic acid
In vitro fertilization
Live birth rate
Transfer medium
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/fertnstert
Citation
Fertility and Sterility, 2021, v. 116 n. 4, p. 1001-1009 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare the effects of hyaluronic acid (HA)–enriched transfer medium versus standard medium on live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer (FET). Design: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: Two tertiary fertility centers. Patient(s): Infertile women aged <43 years at the time of in vitro fertilization undergoing FET. Intervention(s): The women were randomly assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The HA group used EmbryoGlue (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden) with an HA concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, while the control group used supplemented G-2 (Vitrolife) medium with an HA concentration of 0.125 mg/mL. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth rate. Result(s): Five hundred fifty women were recruited from April 2016 to April 2018 and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Eight women in the HA group and 5 women in the control group did not undergo FET because the embryos did not survive on thawing. One woman in the HA group cancelled FET because of fever. One woman in the HA group withdrew and received conventional medium. The 2 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. The live birth rates in the HA group and the control group were comparable (25.5% vs. 25.8%; relative risk 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.74–1.31). The other clinical outcomes were also similar between the 2 groups. Logistic regression showed that the type of transfer medium was not associated with live birth. Conclusion(s): The use of HA-enriched transfer medium does not improve the live birth rate of FET compared with standard medium. Trial Registration Number: NCT02725827 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305930
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.858
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYung, SSF-
dc.contributor.authorLai, SF-
dc.contributor.authorLam, MT-
dc.contributor.authorLui, EMW-
dc.contributor.authorKo, JKY-
dc.contributor.authorLi, HWR-
dc.contributor.authorWong, JYY-
dc.contributor.authorLau, EYL-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, WSB-
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHY-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:16:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:16:22Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationFertility and Sterility, 2021, v. 116 n. 4, p. 1001-1009-
dc.identifier.issn0015-0282-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305930-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the effects of hyaluronic acid (HA)–enriched transfer medium versus standard medium on live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer (FET). Design: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: Two tertiary fertility centers. Patient(s): Infertile women aged <43 years at the time of in vitro fertilization undergoing FET. Intervention(s): The women were randomly assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The HA group used EmbryoGlue (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden) with an HA concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, while the control group used supplemented G-2 (Vitrolife) medium with an HA concentration of 0.125 mg/mL. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth rate. Result(s): Five hundred fifty women were recruited from April 2016 to April 2018 and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Eight women in the HA group and 5 women in the control group did not undergo FET because the embryos did not survive on thawing. One woman in the HA group cancelled FET because of fever. One woman in the HA group withdrew and received conventional medium. The 2 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. The live birth rates in the HA group and the control group were comparable (25.5% vs. 25.8%; relative risk 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.74–1.31). The other clinical outcomes were also similar between the 2 groups. Logistic regression showed that the type of transfer medium was not associated with live birth. Conclusion(s): The use of HA-enriched transfer medium does not improve the live birth rate of FET compared with standard medium. Trial Registration Number: NCT02725827 (ClinicalTrials.gov)-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/fertnstert-
dc.relation.ispartofFertility and Sterility-
dc.subjectFrozen embryo transfer-
dc.subjectHyaluronic acid-
dc.subjectIn vitro fertilization-
dc.subjectLive birth rate-
dc.subjectTransfer medium-
dc.titleHyaluronic acid–enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYung, SSF: ssfyung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLi, HWR: raymondli@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLau, EYL: eyllau@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, WSB: wsbyeung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, EHY: nghye@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYung, SSF=rp00287-
dc.identifier.authorityLi, HWR=rp01649-
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, WSB=rp00331-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, EHY=rp00426-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.015-
dc.identifier.pmid33845988-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85103983302-
dc.identifier.hkuros326637-
dc.identifier.volume116-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1001-
dc.identifier.epage1009-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000705829400016-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats