File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The application of late amniocentesis: a retrospective study in a tertiary fetal medicine center in China

TitleThe application of late amniocentesis: a retrospective study in a tertiary fetal medicine center in China
Authors
KeywordsPrenatal diagnosis
Chromosomal microarray analysis
Fetal abnormalities
Late amniocentesis
Whole-exome sequencing
Issue Date2021
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/
Citation
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2021, v. 21 n. 1, p. article no. 266 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: To assess the indications and complications of late amniocentesis and the advanced genetic test results in a tertiary university fetal medical medicine unit. Methods: In this retrospective study, women that underwent amniocentesis at 24+ 0 to 39+ 4 weeks, between January 2014 and December 2019, were recruited. Indications, complications, genetic test results, and pregnancy outcomes were reported for each pregnancy and compared with those who underwent the traditional amniocentesis at 16+ 0 to 23+ 6 weeks (control group). Information was retrieved from patient medical records, checked by research staff, and analyzed. Results: Of the 1287 women (1321 fetuses) included in the late amniocentesis group, late detected sonographic abnormalities (85.5%) were the most common indication. The overall incidence of preterm birth and intrauterine demise after amniocentesis were 2.5 and 1.3%, respectively. Sixty-nine fetuses with aneuploidy (5.3%) and seventy-two fetuses with pathogenic copy number variations (5.5%) were identified by chromosomal microarray analysis. The maximal diagnostic yield (70%) was in the subgroup of fetuses with the abnormal diagnostic test results, followed by abnormal NIPT results (35.7%) and multiple abnormalities (23.8%). And 35.4% of the pregnancies were finally terminated. Conclusions: Due to the high detection rates of advanced genetic technologies and the safety of the invasive procedure (3.9% vs 4.0%), it is reasonable to recommend late amniocentesis as an effective and reliable method to detect late-onset fetal abnormalities. However, chromosomal microarray and whole-exome sequencing may result in uncertain results like variants of uncertain significance. Comprehensive genetic counseling is necessary.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305490
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.105
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.299
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLI, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYan, H-
dc.contributor.authorChen, J-
dc.contributor.authorChen, F-
dc.contributor.authorJian, W-
dc.contributor.authorWang, J-
dc.contributor.authorYe, X-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLi, N-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PCN-
dc.contributor.authorChen, M-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:10:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:10:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2021, v. 21 n. 1, p. article no. 266-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2393-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305490-
dc.description.abstractBackground: To assess the indications and complications of late amniocentesis and the advanced genetic test results in a tertiary university fetal medical medicine unit. Methods: In this retrospective study, women that underwent amniocentesis at 24+ 0 to 39+ 4 weeks, between January 2014 and December 2019, were recruited. Indications, complications, genetic test results, and pregnancy outcomes were reported for each pregnancy and compared with those who underwent the traditional amniocentesis at 16+ 0 to 23+ 6 weeks (control group). Information was retrieved from patient medical records, checked by research staff, and analyzed. Results: Of the 1287 women (1321 fetuses) included in the late amniocentesis group, late detected sonographic abnormalities (85.5%) were the most common indication. The overall incidence of preterm birth and intrauterine demise after amniocentesis were 2.5 and 1.3%, respectively. Sixty-nine fetuses with aneuploidy (5.3%) and seventy-two fetuses with pathogenic copy number variations (5.5%) were identified by chromosomal microarray analysis. The maximal diagnostic yield (70%) was in the subgroup of fetuses with the abnormal diagnostic test results, followed by abnormal NIPT results (35.7%) and multiple abnormalities (23.8%). And 35.4% of the pregnancies were finally terminated. Conclusions: Due to the high detection rates of advanced genetic technologies and the safety of the invasive procedure (3.9% vs 4.0%), it is reasonable to recommend late amniocentesis as an effective and reliable method to detect late-onset fetal abnormalities. However, chromosomal microarray and whole-exome sequencing may result in uncertain results like variants of uncertain significance. Comprehensive genetic counseling is necessary.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth-
dc.rightsBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectPrenatal diagnosis-
dc.subjectChromosomal microarray analysis-
dc.subjectFetal abnormalities-
dc.subjectLate amniocentesis-
dc.subjectWhole-exome sequencing-
dc.titleThe application of late amniocentesis: a retrospective study in a tertiary fetal medicine center in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PCN: pchiucn@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, PCN=rp00424-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-021-03723-7-
dc.identifier.pmid33784964-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8011189-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85103609532-
dc.identifier.hkuros327340-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 266-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 266-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000636226400006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats