File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Age‐Specific Associations of Usual Blood Pressure Variability With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: 10‐Year Diabetes Mellitus Cohort Study

TitleAge‐Specific Associations of Usual Blood Pressure Variability With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: 10‐Year Diabetes Mellitus Cohort Study
Authors
Keywordsdiabetes mellitus
mortality
blood pressure
visit‐to‐visit variability
cardiovascular disease
Issue Date2021
PublisherWiley Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial. The Journal's web site is located at http://jaha.ahajournals.org/
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021, v. 10 n. 17, p. article no. e019026 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The detrimental effects of increased variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk in patients with diabetes mellitus remains unclear. This study evaluated age‐specific association of usual SBP visit‐to‐visit variability with CVD and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study investigated 155 982 patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45 to 84 years without CVD at baseline (2008–2010). Usual SBP variability was estimated using SBP SD obtained from a mixed‐effects model. Age‐specific associations (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84 years) between usual SBP variability, CVD, and mortality risk were assessed by Cox regression adjusted for patient characteristics. After a median follow‐up of 9.7 years, 49 816 events (including 34 039 CVD events and 29 211 mortalities) were identified. Elevated SBP variability was independently, positively, and log‐linearly associated with higher CVD and mortality risk among all age groups, with no evidence of any threshold effects. The excess CVD and mortality risk per 5 mm Hg increase in SBP variability within the 45 to 54 age group is >3 times higher than the 70 to 79 age group (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.49–1.85 versus hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15–1.23). The significant associations remained consistent among all subgroups. Patients with younger age had a higher association of SBP variability with event outcomes. Conclusions: The findings suggest that SBP visit‐to‐visit variability was strongly associated with CVD and mortality with no evidence of a threshold effect in a population with diabetes mellitus. As well as controlling overall blood pressure levels, SBP visit‐to‐visit variability should be monitored and evaluated in routine practice, in particular for younger patients.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305380
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.126
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, EYF-
dc.contributor.authorYu, EYT-
dc.contributor.authorChin, WY-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, JK-
dc.contributor.authorWong, ICK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, EWY-
dc.contributor.authorChui, CSL-
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, S-
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLK-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:08:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:08:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Heart Association, 2021, v. 10 n. 17, p. article no. e019026-
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305380-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The detrimental effects of increased variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk in patients with diabetes mellitus remains unclear. This study evaluated age‐specific association of usual SBP visit‐to‐visit variability with CVD and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort study investigated 155 982 patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45 to 84 years without CVD at baseline (2008–2010). Usual SBP variability was estimated using SBP SD obtained from a mixed‐effects model. Age‐specific associations (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84 years) between usual SBP variability, CVD, and mortality risk were assessed by Cox regression adjusted for patient characteristics. After a median follow‐up of 9.7 years, 49 816 events (including 34 039 CVD events and 29 211 mortalities) were identified. Elevated SBP variability was independently, positively, and log‐linearly associated with higher CVD and mortality risk among all age groups, with no evidence of any threshold effects. The excess CVD and mortality risk per 5 mm Hg increase in SBP variability within the 45 to 54 age group is >3 times higher than the 70 to 79 age group (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.49–1.85 versus hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15–1.23). The significant associations remained consistent among all subgroups. Patients with younger age had a higher association of SBP variability with event outcomes. Conclusions: The findings suggest that SBP visit‐to‐visit variability was strongly associated with CVD and mortality with no evidence of a threshold effect in a population with diabetes mellitus. As well as controlling overall blood pressure levels, SBP visit‐to‐visit variability should be monitored and evaluated in routine practice, in particular for younger patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial. The Journal's web site is located at http://jaha.ahajournals.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Heart Association-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus-
dc.subjectmortality-
dc.subjectblood pressure-
dc.subjectvisit‐to‐visit variability-
dc.subjectcardiovascular disease-
dc.titleAge‐Specific Associations of Usual Blood Pressure Variability With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: 10‐Year Diabetes Mellitus Cohort Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWan, EYF: yfwan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYu, EYT: ytyu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChin, WY: chinwy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, ICK: wongick@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, EWY: ewchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChui, CSL: cslchui@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWan, EYF=rp02518-
dc.identifier.authorityYu, EYT=rp01693-
dc.identifier.authorityChin, WY=rp00290-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, ICK=rp01480-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, EWY=rp01587-
dc.identifier.authorityChui, CSL=rp02527-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/JAHA.120.019026-
dc.identifier.pmid34398678-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85116058661-
dc.identifier.hkuros327705-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue17-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e019026-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e019026-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000693361200083-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats