File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/10192557.2020.1867794
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85114889878
- WOS: WOS:000695982500001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Jury Trial and Public Trust in the Judiciary: Evidence from Cross-countries Comparison
Title | Jury Trial and Public Trust in the Judiciary: Evidence from Cross-countries Comparison |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Jury trial trust judiciary cross-countries comparison empirical |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://tandfonline.com/toc/rplr20/current |
Citation | Asia Pacific Law Review, 2021, Epub 2021-09-14 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The jury is an institution that has evoked praise and criticism throughout its history. Recently, it has also triggered debate in many countries as they reform their judicial processes. Gathering data on 111 countries from various sources to analyse the jury as part of the judicial system, we find that public trust in the judiciary is higher in countries with jury trials than in countries without them. Countries that conduct jury trials also tend to have stronger judicial constraints on other sources of governmental power and better-performing criminal adjudication systems. These analyses reveal correlation rather than causation, but they are helpful for challenging conventional wisdom and for better understanding the function of the jury system. The seemingly paradoxical patterns that are identified — namely, that the jury, designed to constrain the judiciary, ends up correlated with stronger judicial power, and that laypeople, supposedly less proficient than professionals in deciding cases, are in fact positively associated with judicial performance — suggest an internal connection between the jury as a judicial body and as a political institution. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/305364 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.176 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, JZ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, L | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-20T10:08:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-20T10:08:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Asia Pacific Law Review, 2021, Epub 2021-09-14 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1019-2557 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/305364 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The jury is an institution that has evoked praise and criticism throughout its history. Recently, it has also triggered debate in many countries as they reform their judicial processes. Gathering data on 111 countries from various sources to analyse the jury as part of the judicial system, we find that public trust in the judiciary is higher in countries with jury trials than in countries without them. Countries that conduct jury trials also tend to have stronger judicial constraints on other sources of governmental power and better-performing criminal adjudication systems. These analyses reveal correlation rather than causation, but they are helpful for challenging conventional wisdom and for better understanding the function of the jury system. The seemingly paradoxical patterns that are identified — namely, that the jury, designed to constrain the judiciary, ends up correlated with stronger judicial power, and that laypeople, supposedly less proficient than professionals in deciding cases, are in fact positively associated with judicial performance — suggest an internal connection between the jury as a judicial body and as a political institution. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://tandfonline.com/toc/rplr20/current | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Asia Pacific Law Review | - |
dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. | - |
dc.subject | Jury trial | - |
dc.subject | trust | - |
dc.subject | judiciary | - |
dc.subject | cross-countries comparison | - |
dc.subject | empirical | - |
dc.title | Jury Trial and Public Trust in the Judiciary: Evidence from Cross-countries Comparison | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Liu, JZ: liuz@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Liu, JZ=rp02737 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10192557.2020.1867794 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85114889878 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 327229 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | Epub 2021-09-14 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000695982500001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |