File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

TitleA Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Authors
Keywordsprostate cancer
abiraterone (AA)
enzalutamide (ENZ)
apalutamide
docetaxel
Issue Date2021
PublisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/oncology
Citation
Frontiers in Oncology, 2021, v. 11, p. article no. 627083 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Currently, approved first-line treatment options of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) include (1) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, ADT plus one of the following: (2) docetaxel, (3) abiraterone, (4) enzalutamide, and (5) apalutamide. The high cost of novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors warrants an understanding of the combinations’ value by considering both efficacy and cost. Objective: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of these five treatment options in mHSPC from the US payer perspective to guide treatment sequence. Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of these five first-line treatment options for mHSPC using outcomes data from published literature. Health outcomes were measured in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Drug costs were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Pharmaceutical Catalog. We extrapolated survival beyond closure of the trials. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Life-years, QALYs, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated. Univariable, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate parameter uncertainty. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000 per QALY was used. Results: Compared to ADT alone, docetaxel plus ADT provided a 0.28 QALY gain at an ICER of US$12,870 per QALY. Abiraterone plus ADT provided an additional 1.70 QALYs against docetaxel plus ADT, with an ICER of US$38,897 per QALY. Compared to abiraterone plus ADT, enzalutamide plus ADT provided an additional 0.87 QALYs at an ICER of US$509,813 per QALY. Apalutamide plus ADT was strongly dominated by enzalutamide plus ADT. Given the WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY, abiraterone plus ADT represented high-value health care. Conclusions: Abiraterone plus ADT is the preferred treatment option for men with mHSPC at a WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305308
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.066
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSung, WWY-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, HCW-
dc.contributor.authorLuk, PHY-
dc.contributor.authorSo, TH-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:07:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:07:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Oncology, 2021, v. 11, p. article no. 627083-
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305308-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Currently, approved first-line treatment options of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) include (1) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, ADT plus one of the following: (2) docetaxel, (3) abiraterone, (4) enzalutamide, and (5) apalutamide. The high cost of novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors warrants an understanding of the combinations’ value by considering both efficacy and cost. Objective: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of these five treatment options in mHSPC from the US payer perspective to guide treatment sequence. Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of these five first-line treatment options for mHSPC using outcomes data from published literature. Health outcomes were measured in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Drug costs were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Pharmaceutical Catalog. We extrapolated survival beyond closure of the trials. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Life-years, QALYs, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated. Univariable, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate parameter uncertainty. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000 per QALY was used. Results: Compared to ADT alone, docetaxel plus ADT provided a 0.28 QALY gain at an ICER of US$12,870 per QALY. Abiraterone plus ADT provided an additional 1.70 QALYs against docetaxel plus ADT, with an ICER of US$38,897 per QALY. Compared to abiraterone plus ADT, enzalutamide plus ADT provided an additional 0.87 QALYs at an ICER of US$509,813 per QALY. Apalutamide plus ADT was strongly dominated by enzalutamide plus ADT. Given the WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY, abiraterone plus ADT represented high-value health care. Conclusions: Abiraterone plus ADT is the preferred treatment option for men with mHSPC at a WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/oncology-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncology-
dc.rightsThis Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectprostate cancer-
dc.subjectabiraterone (AA)-
dc.subjectenzalutamide (ENZ)-
dc.subjectapalutamide-
dc.subjectdocetaxel-
dc.titleA Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChoi, HCW: hcchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailSo, TH: sth495@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChoi, HCW=rp02815-
dc.identifier.authoritySo, TH=rp01981-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2021.627083-
dc.identifier.pmid33718198-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7943717-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85102365612-
dc.identifier.hkuros327880-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 627083-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 627083-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000626894200001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats