File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Added-Sugar Content of Packaged Foods

TitleA Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Added-Sugar Content of Packaged Foods
Authors
KeywordsMachine learning
Added sugar
Estimation
Prediction
Automated
Packaged foods
Issue Date2022
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jn.nutrition.org
Citation
The Journal of Nutrition, 2022, v. 152 n. 1, p. 343-349 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Dietary guidelines recommend limiting the intake of added sugars. However, despite the public health importance, most countries have not mandated the labeling of added-sugar content on packaged foods and beverages, making it difficult for consumers to avoid products with added sugar, and limiting the ability of policymakers to identify priority products for intervention. Objective: The aim was to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of added-sugar content in packaged products using available nutrient, ingredient, and food category information. Methods: The added-sugar prediction algorithm was developed using k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and packaged food information from the US Label Insight dataset (n = 70,522). A synthetic dataset of Australian packaged products (n = 500) was used to assess validity and generalization. Performance metrics included the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and Spearman rank correlation (ρ). To benchmark the KNN approach, the KNN approach was compared with an existing added-sugar prediction approach that relies on a series of manual steps. Results: Compared with the existing added-sugar prediction approach, the KNN approach was similarly apt at explaining variation in added-sugar content (R2 = 0.96 vs. 0.97, respectively) and ranking products from highest to lowest in added-sugar content (ρ = 0.91 vs. 0.93, respectively), while less apt at minimizing absolute deviations between predicted and true values (MAE = 1.68 g vs. 1.26 g per 100 g or 100 mL, respectively). Conclusions: KNN can be used to predict added-sugar content in packaged products with a high degree of validity. Being automated, KNN can easily be applied to large datasets. Such predicted added-sugar levels can be used to monitor the food supply and inform interventions aimed at reducing added-sugar intake.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305126
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.098
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavies, T-
dc.contributor.authorLouie, JCY-
dc.contributor.authorNdanuko, R-
dc.contributor.authorBarbieri, S-
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Concha, O-
dc.contributor.authorWu, JHY-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:40:06Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:40:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Nutrition, 2022, v. 152 n. 1, p. 343-349-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3166-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305126-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dietary guidelines recommend limiting the intake of added sugars. However, despite the public health importance, most countries have not mandated the labeling of added-sugar content on packaged foods and beverages, making it difficult for consumers to avoid products with added sugar, and limiting the ability of policymakers to identify priority products for intervention. Objective: The aim was to develop a machine learning approach for the prediction of added-sugar content in packaged products using available nutrient, ingredient, and food category information. Methods: The added-sugar prediction algorithm was developed using k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and packaged food information from the US Label Insight dataset (n = 70,522). A synthetic dataset of Australian packaged products (n = 500) was used to assess validity and generalization. Performance metrics included the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and Spearman rank correlation (ρ). To benchmark the KNN approach, the KNN approach was compared with an existing added-sugar prediction approach that relies on a series of manual steps. Results: Compared with the existing added-sugar prediction approach, the KNN approach was similarly apt at explaining variation in added-sugar content (R2 = 0.96 vs. 0.97, respectively) and ranking products from highest to lowest in added-sugar content (ρ = 0.91 vs. 0.93, respectively), while less apt at minimizing absolute deviations between predicted and true values (MAE = 1.68 g vs. 1.26 g per 100 g or 100 mL, respectively). Conclusions: KNN can be used to predict added-sugar content in packaged products with a high degree of validity. Being automated, KNN can easily be applied to large datasets. Such predicted added-sugar levels can be used to monitor the food supply and inform interventions aimed at reducing added-sugar intake.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jn.nutrition.org-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Nutrition-
dc.subjectMachine learning-
dc.subjectAdded sugar-
dc.subjectEstimation-
dc.subjectPrediction-
dc.subjectAutomated-
dc.subjectPackaged foods-
dc.titleA Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Added-Sugar Content of Packaged Foods-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLouie, JCY: jimmyl@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLouie, JCY=rp02118-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jn/nxab341-
dc.identifier.pmid34550390-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85123648945-
dc.identifier.hkuros326481-
dc.identifier.volume152-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage343-
dc.identifier.epage349-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000745037900036-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats