File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Diagnostic accuracy of self‐reported measures of periodontal disease: A clinical validation study using the 2017 case definitions

TitleDiagnostic accuracy of self‐reported measures of periodontal disease: A clinical validation study using the 2017 case definitions
Authors
Keywordsdiagnostic accuracy
periodontitis
screening
self-reported questionnaire
sensitivity and specificity
Issue Date2021
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2021, v. 48 n. 8, p. 1037-1050 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To clinically validate a self-reported questionnaire for periodontal disease and assess its accuracy for differentiating periodontal health and different stages of periodontitis. Methods: A Chinese (Cantonese) version of a self-reported questionnaire was prepared by translating and validating the original English questions proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP). The utility of the CDC/AAP questionnaire and its individual questions was assessed against a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontal case definition was based on the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Multivariable logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis were performed to assess the accuracy of the questionnaire. Results: 408 subjects enrolled in this study, including those with periodontal health (16.2%), gingivitis (15.2%), Stages I/II periodontitis (31.8%) and Stages III/IV periodontitis (36.8%). Overall, the questionnaire had poor accuracy in detecting the presence of Stages I/II periodontitis with an AUROC 0.608. While it showed moderate to high accuracy for identifying periodontal disease (gingivitis and periodontitis), periodontitis and Stages III/IV periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.837, 0.803 and 0.870, respectively. Self-reported measures in combination with age and tobacco smoking showed excellent performance for identifying Stages III/IV periodontitis with a high AUROC of 0.953, a sensitivity of 95.7%, and a specificity of 89.0%. Specific questions and combinations provided greater utility to discriminate the various periodontal case definitions. Conclusions: The self-reported CDC/AAP questionnaire may be a feasible tool for detecting periodontitis, and its combination with demographic and lifestyle factors is useful for the identification of individuals with Stages III/IV periodontitis. This questionnaire seems less helpful in screening of Stages I/II periodontitis. Further studies are needed to test the validity in larger community-based populations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304646
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeng, K-
dc.contributor.authorPelekos, G-
dc.contributor.authorJin, L-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, M-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:33:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:33:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2021, v. 48 n. 8, p. 1037-1050-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304646-
dc.description.abstractAim: To clinically validate a self-reported questionnaire for periodontal disease and assess its accuracy for differentiating periodontal health and different stages of periodontitis. Methods: A Chinese (Cantonese) version of a self-reported questionnaire was prepared by translating and validating the original English questions proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP). The utility of the CDC/AAP questionnaire and its individual questions was assessed against a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontal case definition was based on the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases. Multivariable logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis were performed to assess the accuracy of the questionnaire. Results: 408 subjects enrolled in this study, including those with periodontal health (16.2%), gingivitis (15.2%), Stages I/II periodontitis (31.8%) and Stages III/IV periodontitis (36.8%). Overall, the questionnaire had poor accuracy in detecting the presence of Stages I/II periodontitis with an AUROC 0.608. While it showed moderate to high accuracy for identifying periodontal disease (gingivitis and periodontitis), periodontitis and Stages III/IV periodontitis with an AUROC of 0.837, 0.803 and 0.870, respectively. Self-reported measures in combination with age and tobacco smoking showed excellent performance for identifying Stages III/IV periodontitis with a high AUROC of 0.953, a sensitivity of 95.7%, and a specificity of 89.0%. Specific questions and combinations provided greater utility to discriminate the various periodontal case definitions. Conclusions: The self-reported CDC/AAP questionnaire may be a feasible tool for detecting periodontitis, and its combination with demographic and lifestyle factors is useful for the identification of individuals with Stages III/IV periodontitis. This questionnaire seems less helpful in screening of Stages I/II periodontitis. Further studies are needed to test the validity in larger community-based populations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.rightsSubmitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy-
dc.subjectperiodontitis-
dc.subjectscreening-
dc.subjectself-reported questionnaire-
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity-
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of self‐reported measures of periodontal disease: A clinical validation study using the 2017 case definitions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailPelekos, G: george74@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailJin, L: ljjin@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTonetti, M: tonetti@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityPelekos, G=rp01894-
dc.identifier.authorityJin, L=rp00028-
dc.identifier.authorityTonetti, M=rp02178-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.13484-
dc.identifier.pmid33998009-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85107403556-
dc.identifier.hkuros326460-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1037-
dc.identifier.epage1050-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000656739300001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats