File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00043249.2021.1920288
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85115251803
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Coercive Disobedience: Art and Simulated Transgression
Title | Coercive Disobedience: Art and Simulated Transgression |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis for College Art Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://tandfonline.com/toc/rcaj20/current |
Citation | Art Journal, 2021, v. 80 n. 3, p. 78-99 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Coercive disobedience is a targeted mode of protest; it goads retribution, dialogically exposing laws and policies in a manner that is potentially damaging to the interests of dominant elites. While previous discussions of coercive disobedience are limited to political science, law, and philosophy, I propose a consideration of such modes of dissent within an art context. Under consideration are experiments in simulated transgression realized by Paolo Cirio and Alessandro Ludovico, as well as James Baumgartner and UBERMORGEN. In their transgressing of conventional forms of lawbreaking, their artworks became crimes, not because a crime was committed but because they were pursued as crimes. The artists’ mode of coercive disobedience encourages a questioning of how and why simulated transgressions were able to generate powerful legal consequences and retaliatory actions. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304587 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.118 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Steinberg, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-05T02:32:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-05T02:32:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Art Journal, 2021, v. 80 n. 3, p. 78-99 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0004-3249 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304587 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Coercive disobedience is a targeted mode of protest; it goads retribution, dialogically exposing laws and policies in a manner that is potentially damaging to the interests of dominant elites. While previous discussions of coercive disobedience are limited to political science, law, and philosophy, I propose a consideration of such modes of dissent within an art context. Under consideration are experiments in simulated transgression realized by Paolo Cirio and Alessandro Ludovico, as well as James Baumgartner and UBERMORGEN. In their transgressing of conventional forms of lawbreaking, their artworks became crimes, not because a crime was committed but because they were pursued as crimes. The artists’ mode of coercive disobedience encourages a questioning of how and why simulated transgressions were able to generate powerful legal consequences and retaliatory actions. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis for College Art Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://tandfonline.com/toc/rcaj20/current | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Art Journal | - |
dc.title | Coercive Disobedience: Art and Simulated Transgression | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Steinberg, M: mstein@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Steinberg, M=rp02559 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00043249.2021.1920288 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85115251803 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 325872 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 80 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 78 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 99 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |