File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evidence that genetic compatibility underpins female mate choice in a monandrous amphibian

TitleEvidence that genetic compatibility underpins female mate choice in a monandrous amphibian
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://lsvl.la.asu.edu/evolution/
Citation
Evolution, 2021, v. 75 n. 2, p. 529-541 How to Cite?
AbstractMate choice for genetic benefits remains controversial, largely because few studies have estimated the relative contributions of additive and non-additive sources of genetic variation to offspring fitness. Moreover, there remains a deficit of these estimates for species where female-mate preferences have been quantified in the wild, especially species characterized by monandry or monogamy. Here, we use artificial fertilization techniques combined with a cross-classified breeding design to simultaneously test for “good genes” and “compatible genes” benefits of mate choice in the monandrous red backed toadlet (Pseudophryne coriacea). In addition, we used a genomic approach to estimate effects of parental-genetic relatedness (assessed using 27, 768 single nucleotide polymorphisms) on offspring fitness. Our results revealed no significant additive genetic effects (sire effects), but highly significant non-additive genetic effects (sire × dam interaction effects), on fertilization success, survival during embryonic development, and hatching success. We also found significant associations between parental genetic similarity and offspring survival (whereby survival was higher when parents were more related), and significant positive relationships between fertilization success and embryo survival through to hatching. These results indicate that offspring viability is significantly influenced by the genetic compatibility of parental genotypes, that more related parents are more genetically compatible, and that gametes with greater compatibility at fertilization produce more viable offspring. More broadly, our findings provide new quantitative genetic evidence that genetic incompatibility underpins female mate preferences. Continued quantitative genetic assessment of the relative importance of good genes versus compatible genes is needed to ascertain the general importance of genetic benefits as a driver of female mate choice.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304395
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.235
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorByrne, PG-
dc.contributor.authorKeogh, S-
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, DM-
dc.contributor.authorGaitan Espitia, JD-
dc.contributor.authorSilla, AJ-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T08:59:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-23T08:59:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEvolution, 2021, v. 75 n. 2, p. 529-541-
dc.identifier.issn0014-3820-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304395-
dc.description.abstractMate choice for genetic benefits remains controversial, largely because few studies have estimated the relative contributions of additive and non-additive sources of genetic variation to offspring fitness. Moreover, there remains a deficit of these estimates for species where female-mate preferences have been quantified in the wild, especially species characterized by monandry or monogamy. Here, we use artificial fertilization techniques combined with a cross-classified breeding design to simultaneously test for “good genes” and “compatible genes” benefits of mate choice in the monandrous red backed toadlet (Pseudophryne coriacea). In addition, we used a genomic approach to estimate effects of parental-genetic relatedness (assessed using 27, 768 single nucleotide polymorphisms) on offspring fitness. Our results revealed no significant additive genetic effects (sire effects), but highly significant non-additive genetic effects (sire × dam interaction effects), on fertilization success, survival during embryonic development, and hatching success. We also found significant associations between parental genetic similarity and offspring survival (whereby survival was higher when parents were more related), and significant positive relationships between fertilization success and embryo survival through to hatching. These results indicate that offspring viability is significantly influenced by the genetic compatibility of parental genotypes, that more related parents are more genetically compatible, and that gametes with greater compatibility at fertilization produce more viable offspring. More broadly, our findings provide new quantitative genetic evidence that genetic incompatibility underpins female mate preferences. Continued quantitative genetic assessment of the relative importance of good genes versus compatible genes is needed to ascertain the general importance of genetic benefits as a driver of female mate choice.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://lsvl.la.asu.edu/evolution/-
dc.relation.ispartofEvolution-
dc.rightsSubmitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.titleEvidence that genetic compatibility underpins female mate choice in a monandrous amphibian-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGaitan Espitia, JD: jdgaitan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGaitan Espitia, JD=rp02384-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/evo.14160-
dc.identifier.pmid33389749-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85099395293-
dc.identifier.hkuros325482-
dc.identifier.volume75-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage529-
dc.identifier.epage541-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000607379000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats