File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.040
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85061254177
- WOS: WOS:000461411300021
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property
Title | Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Molecular dynamics Thermodynamics Shear coupling Grain boundary Disconnection |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Acta Materialia, 2019, v. 167, p. 241-247 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Shear coupling implies that all grain boundary (GB) migration necessarily creates mechanical stresses/strains and is a key component to the evolution of all polycrystalline microstructures. We present MD simulation data and theoretical analyses that demonstrate the GB shear coupling is not an intrinsic GB property, but rather strongly depends on the type and magnitude of the driving force for migration and temperature. We resolve this apparent paradox by proposing a microscopic theory for GB migration that is based upon a statistical ensemble of line defects (disconnections) that are constrained to lie in the GB. Comparison with the MD results for several GBs provides quantitative validation of the theory of shear coupling factor as a function of stress, chemical potential jump and temperature. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/303600 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.916 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Kongtao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Jian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Spencer L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Srolovitz, David J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-15T08:25:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-15T08:25:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Acta Materialia, 2019, v. 167, p. 241-247 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1359-6454 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/303600 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Shear coupling implies that all grain boundary (GB) migration necessarily creates mechanical stresses/strains and is a key component to the evolution of all polycrystalline microstructures. We present MD simulation data and theoretical analyses that demonstrate the GB shear coupling is not an intrinsic GB property, but rather strongly depends on the type and magnitude of the driving force for migration and temperature. We resolve this apparent paradox by proposing a microscopic theory for GB migration that is based upon a statistical ensemble of line defects (disconnections) that are constrained to lie in the GB. Comparison with the MD results for several GBs provides quantitative validation of the theory of shear coupling factor as a function of stress, chemical potential jump and temperature. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Materialia | - |
dc.subject | Molecular dynamics | - |
dc.subject | Thermodynamics | - |
dc.subject | Shear coupling | - |
dc.subject | Grain boundary | - |
dc.subject | Disconnection | - |
dc.title | Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.040 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85061254177 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 167 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 241 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 247 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000461411300021 | - |