File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Structural Evolution During Recrystallization

TitleStructural Evolution During Recrystallization
Authors
Issue Date1986
Citation
Annealing Processes: Recovery, Recrystallization and Grain Growth, Proceedings of the 7Th Riso International Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1986, p. 53-67 How to Cite?
AbstractThe evidence showing the failure of the classic Johnson-Mehl-Avrami equation to describe most recrystallization kinetics is reviewed. The failure is seen in the value of the exponent in which is less than the theoretically predicted exponents. The reason for this failure is at least in part due to the non-random distribution of nucleation sites. This non-random distribution seems to arise from the grain to grain variation in deformation microstructure. Simple 3-dimensional and more precise 2-dimensional models of the recrystallization kinetics are presented which demonstrate that variation in the stored energy, on the scale of the grain size, does lead to the range of JMA exponents seen experimentally. The importance of this for the resulting grain size distribution is indicated.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303083

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, R. D.-
dc.contributor.authorRollett, A. R.-
dc.contributor.authorSrolovitz, D. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T08:24:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-15T08:24:35Z-
dc.date.issued1986-
dc.identifier.citationAnnealing Processes: Recovery, Recrystallization and Grain Growth, Proceedings of the 7Th Riso International Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1986, p. 53-67-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303083-
dc.description.abstractThe evidence showing the failure of the classic Johnson-Mehl-Avrami equation to describe most recrystallization kinetics is reviewed. The failure is seen in the value of the exponent in which is less than the theoretically predicted exponents. The reason for this failure is at least in part due to the non-random distribution of nucleation sites. This non-random distribution seems to arise from the grain to grain variation in deformation microstructure. Simple 3-dimensional and more precise 2-dimensional models of the recrystallization kinetics are presented which demonstrate that variation in the stored energy, on the scale of the grain size, does lead to the range of JMA exponents seen experimentally. The importance of this for the resulting grain size distribution is indicated.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnealing Processes: Recovery, Recrystallization and Grain Growth, Proceedings of the 7Th Riso International Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science-
dc.titleStructural Evolution During Recrystallization-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0022943658-
dc.identifier.spage53-
dc.identifier.epage67-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats