File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning

TitleThinking styles in implicit and explicit learning
Authors
KeywordsImplicit learning
Explicit learning
Thinking styles
Issue Date2013
Citation
Learning and Individual Differences, 2013, v. 23, n. 1, p. 267-271 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study investigated whether individual differences in thinking styles influence explicit and implicit learning. Eighty-seven university students in China participated in this study. Results indicated that performance in the explicit learning condition was positively associated with Type I thinking styles (i.e. legislative and liberal styles) and the internal style and negatively associated with a Type II thinking style (i.e. conservative style) and the external style. There was no significant relationship between thinking styles and performance in the implicit learning condition. Taken together, these findings suggest that implicit and explicit learning are distinct, each influenced by different individual difference variables. It also provides support to the value-laden nature of styles, giving further evidence to the adaptiveness of Type I over Type II styles. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302151
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.640
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXie, Qiuzhi-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Xiangping-
dc.contributor.authorKing, Ronnel B.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T13:57:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T13:57:54Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationLearning and Individual Differences, 2013, v. 23, n. 1, p. 267-271-
dc.identifier.issn1041-6080-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302151-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated whether individual differences in thinking styles influence explicit and implicit learning. Eighty-seven university students in China participated in this study. Results indicated that performance in the explicit learning condition was positively associated with Type I thinking styles (i.e. legislative and liberal styles) and the internal style and negatively associated with a Type II thinking style (i.e. conservative style) and the external style. There was no significant relationship between thinking styles and performance in the implicit learning condition. Taken together, these findings suggest that implicit and explicit learning are distinct, each influenced by different individual difference variables. It also provides support to the value-laden nature of styles, giving further evidence to the adaptiveness of Type I over Type II styles. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLearning and Individual Differences-
dc.subjectImplicit learning-
dc.subjectExplicit learning-
dc.subjectThinking styles-
dc.titleThinking styles in implicit and explicit learning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.014-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84871919597-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage267-
dc.identifier.epage271-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3425-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000314258200036-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats