File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Typological Analysis of the Chinese Qin in the Late Bronze Age

TitleTypological Analysis of the Chinese Qin in the Late Bronze Age
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherInternational Council for Traditional Music.
Citation
The 45th International Council for Traditional Music World Conference (ICTM 2019), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 11-17 July 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractThe qin, a type of horizontal zither, has been China's foremost musical instrument since the age of Confucius (551-479 BCE). From an archaeological perspective, however, very little was known about the morphology of the Bronze Age qin until the discovery of the tomb of Marquis Yi, dated to 433 BCE, in Suizhou. Four other instruments of the same kind have also been excavated in the last four decades. This paper aims to carry out a typological analysis of Chinese Bronze Age qin based on this corpus of available specimens. All five share the characteristic that from one end to the other they can be described as consisting of five 'registers' or sections, each with a particular characteristic and purpose. Inside this lineage of similarity, they can be further categorized into two types: Type I comprises those from Suizhou and Jiuliandun, and Type II is represented by the qin from Guodian, Wulipai, and Mawangdui. In summary. Type I instruments are around 70cm in length, whilst Type II are 80cm, though still significantly shorter than the Medieval and modern qin which is typically 120cm. The 10-stringed Type I evolved into the seven-stringed Type II, and the Medieval version still employs only seven strings. Similarly, the slanting bridge of Type I became the parallel bridge of Type II, and the Medieval instrument retains this characteristic. The division into five registers is most marked in the most ancient Type I, and softens in Type II specimens, whilst it disappears completely in the Medieval qin which thus has a much more coherent overall shape. Thus, it seems reasonable to regard Type II as a transitional stage in an evolutionary process leading to the Medieval instrument, and this notion matches the approximate dates of manufacture.
DescriptionVD10: Musical Instruments, Past and Present
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302020

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-21T03:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-21T03:30:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe 45th International Council for Traditional Music World Conference (ICTM 2019), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 11-17 July 2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302020-
dc.descriptionVD10: Musical Instruments, Past and Present-
dc.description.abstractThe qin, a type of horizontal zither, has been China's foremost musical instrument since the age of Confucius (551-479 BCE). From an archaeological perspective, however, very little was known about the morphology of the Bronze Age qin until the discovery of the tomb of Marquis Yi, dated to 433 BCE, in Suizhou. Four other instruments of the same kind have also been excavated in the last four decades. This paper aims to carry out a typological analysis of Chinese Bronze Age qin based on this corpus of available specimens. All five share the characteristic that from one end to the other they can be described as consisting of five 'registers' or sections, each with a particular characteristic and purpose. Inside this lineage of similarity, they can be further categorized into two types: Type I comprises those from Suizhou and Jiuliandun, and Type II is represented by the qin from Guodian, Wulipai, and Mawangdui. In summary. Type I instruments are around 70cm in length, whilst Type II are 80cm, though still significantly shorter than the Medieval and modern qin which is typically 120cm. The 10-stringed Type I evolved into the seven-stringed Type II, and the Medieval version still employs only seven strings. Similarly, the slanting bridge of Type I became the parallel bridge of Type II, and the Medieval instrument retains this characteristic. The division into five registers is most marked in the most ancient Type I, and softens in Type II specimens, whilst it disappears completely in the Medieval qin which thus has a much more coherent overall shape. Thus, it seems reasonable to regard Type II as a transitional stage in an evolutionary process leading to the Medieval instrument, and this notion matches the approximate dates of manufacture. -
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInternational Council for Traditional Music. -
dc.relation.ispartofThe 45th ICTM (International Council for Traditional Music) World Conference-
dc.titleTypological Analysis of the Chinese Qin in the Late Bronze Age-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailYang, Y: yuanzhen@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYang, Y=rp01559-
dc.identifier.hkuros324608-
dc.publisher.placeBangkok-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats