File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s11214-021-00829-4
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85105491654
- WOS: WOS:000647630400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events from Impostors
Title | Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events from Impostors |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Tidal Disruption Events Active galactic nuclei Supernovae Gamma-ray bursts |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Springer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.springer.com/journal/11214 |
Citation | Space Science Reviews, 2021, v. 217, p. article no. 54 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Recent claimed detections of tidal disruption events (TDEs) in multi-wavelength data have opened potential new windows into the evolution and properties of otherwise dormant supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the centres of galaxies. At present, there are several dozen TDE candidates, which share some properties and differ in others. The range in properties is broad enough to overlap other transient types, such as active galactic nuclei (AGN) and supernovae (SNe), which can make TDE classification ambiguous. A further complication is that “TDE signatures” have not been uniformly observed to similar sensitivities or even targeted across all candidates. This chapter both reviews those events that are unusual relative to other TDEs, including the possibility of TDEs in pre-existing AGN, and summarises those characteristics thought to best distinguish TDEs from continuously accreting AGN, strongly flaring AGN, SNe, and Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), as well as other potential impostors like stellar collisions, “micro-TDEs,” and circumbinary accretion flows. We conclude that multiple observables should be used to classify any one event as a TDE. We also consider the TDE candidate population as a whole, which, for certain host galaxy or SMBH characteristics, is distinguishable statistically from non-TDEs, suggesting that at least some TDE candidates do in fact arise from SMBH-disrupted stars. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/301954 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.485 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zabludoff, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Arcavi, I | - |
dc.contributor.author | La Massa, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Perets, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Trakhtenbrot,, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zauderer, BA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Auchettl, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dai, JL | - |
dc.contributor.author | French, KD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hung, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kara, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lodato, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maksym, WP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qin, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ramirez-Ruiz, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Roth, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Runnoe, JC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wevers, T | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-21T03:29:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-21T03:29:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Space Science Reviews, 2021, v. 217, p. article no. 54 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0038-6308 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/301954 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recent claimed detections of tidal disruption events (TDEs) in multi-wavelength data have opened potential new windows into the evolution and properties of otherwise dormant supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the centres of galaxies. At present, there are several dozen TDE candidates, which share some properties and differ in others. The range in properties is broad enough to overlap other transient types, such as active galactic nuclei (AGN) and supernovae (SNe), which can make TDE classification ambiguous. A further complication is that “TDE signatures” have not been uniformly observed to similar sensitivities or even targeted across all candidates. This chapter both reviews those events that are unusual relative to other TDEs, including the possibility of TDEs in pre-existing AGN, and summarises those characteristics thought to best distinguish TDEs from continuously accreting AGN, strongly flaring AGN, SNe, and Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), as well as other potential impostors like stellar collisions, “micro-TDEs,” and circumbinary accretion flows. We conclude that multiple observables should be used to classify any one event as a TDE. We also consider the TDE candidate population as a whole, which, for certain host galaxy or SMBH characteristics, is distinguishable statistically from non-TDEs, suggesting that at least some TDE candidates do in fact arise from SMBH-disrupted stars. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.springer.com/journal/11214 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Space Science Reviews | - |
dc.rights | Accepted Manuscript (AAM) This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI] | - |
dc.subject | Tidal Disruption Events | - |
dc.subject | Active galactic nuclei | - |
dc.subject | Supernovae | - |
dc.subject | Gamma-ray bursts | - |
dc.title | Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events from Impostors | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Dai, JL: lixindai@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Dai, JL=rp02540 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11214-021-00829-4 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85105491654 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 324199 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 217 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 54 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 54 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000647630400001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | - |