File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cross‐cultural applicability of the Self‐Care Self‐Efficacy Scale in a multi‐national study

TitleCross‐cultural applicability of the Self‐Care Self‐Efficacy Scale in a multi‐national study
自我护理自我效能量表在跨国研究中的跨文化适用性
Authors
Keywordschronic disease
cross-cultural comparison
disease management
illness behaviour
nursing care
Issue Date2021
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journalofadvancednursing.com/
Citation
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2021, v. 77 n. 2, p. 681-692 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: The Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES) was newly developed as a self-report measure for self-care self-efficacy for chronic illness. This study investigated its measurement equivalence (ME) in different cultural groups, including United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil. Design: A multi-national study for cross-cultural validation of the Scale. Methods: From January 2015 - December 2018, investigators recruited 957 patients (United State: 200; Hong Kong: 300; Italy: 285; and Brazil: 142) with chronic illness from inpatient and outpatient settings. The SCSES was administered and clinical and demographic data were collected from participants. Based on the Meredith framework, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the scale across the four populations through a series of nested models, with evaluation of reliability and coherence of the factor solution. Results: The mean ages of the groups ranged from 65–77 years, 56.4% was male. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the single-factor SCSES were 0.93, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90 for the United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil, respectively. Three of the four levels of ME were partially or totally supported. The highest level achieved was partial scalar invariance level (χ2 [52] = 313.4, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.067; 95% CI = 0.056–0.077; CFI = 0.966; TLI = 0.960, SRMR = 0.080). Conclusion: Patients from the four countries shared the same philosophical orientation towards scale items, although some of the items contributed differently to represent the concept and participants shared the same schemata for score interpretation. Impact: Self-efficacy is important in producing effective and sustainable self-care behavioural changes. Cultural ideation shapes the ways individuals interpret and report their self-care self-efficacy. The study findings support cross-cultural and cross-national utility of the SCSES for research on self-care across United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301442
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.218
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, DSF-
dc.contributor.authorDe Maria, M-
dc.contributor.authorBarbaranelii, C-
dc.contributor.authorVellone, E-
dc.contributor.authorMartarese, M-
dc.contributor.authorAusili, D-
dc.contributor.authorRejane, RSE-
dc.contributor.authorOsokpo, OH-
dc.contributor.authorRiegel, B-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T08:11:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-27T08:11:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2021, v. 77 n. 2, p. 681-692-
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301442-
dc.description.abstractAim: The Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES) was newly developed as a self-report measure for self-care self-efficacy for chronic illness. This study investigated its measurement equivalence (ME) in different cultural groups, including United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil. Design: A multi-national study for cross-cultural validation of the Scale. Methods: From January 2015 - December 2018, investigators recruited 957 patients (United State: 200; Hong Kong: 300; Italy: 285; and Brazil: 142) with chronic illness from inpatient and outpatient settings. The SCSES was administered and clinical and demographic data were collected from participants. Based on the Meredith framework, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the scale across the four populations through a series of nested models, with evaluation of reliability and coherence of the factor solution. Results: The mean ages of the groups ranged from 65–77 years, 56.4% was male. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the single-factor SCSES were 0.93, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90 for the United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil, respectively. Three of the four levels of ME were partially or totally supported. The highest level achieved was partial scalar invariance level (χ2 [52] = 313.4, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.067; 95% CI = 0.056–0.077; CFI = 0.966; TLI = 0.960, SRMR = 0.080). Conclusion: Patients from the four countries shared the same philosophical orientation towards scale items, although some of the items contributed differently to represent the concept and participants shared the same schemata for score interpretation. Impact: Self-efficacy is important in producing effective and sustainable self-care behavioural changes. Cultural ideation shapes the ways individuals interpret and report their self-care self-efficacy. The study findings support cross-cultural and cross-national utility of the SCSES for research on self-care across United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journalofadvancednursing.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursing-
dc.rightsSubmitted (preprint) Version This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectchronic disease-
dc.subjectcross-cultural comparison-
dc.subjectdisease management-
dc.subjectillness behaviour-
dc.subjectnursing care-
dc.titleCross‐cultural applicability of the Self‐Care Self‐Efficacy Scale in a multi‐national study-
dc.title自我护理自我效能量表在跨国研究中的跨文化适用性-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYu, DSF: dyu1@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYu, DSF=rp02647-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.14617-
dc.identifier.pmid33295675-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097320993-
dc.identifier.hkuros323438-
dc.identifier.volume77-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage681-
dc.identifier.epage692-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000607572000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats