File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effects of Treatment Combining 9300 nm Carbon Dioxide Lasers and Fluoride on Prevention of Enamel Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TitleEffects of Treatment Combining 9300 nm Carbon Dioxide Lasers and Fluoride on Prevention of Enamel Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Keywordsfluoride
caries
prevention
laser
enamel
Issue Date2021
PublisherMDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci
Citation
Applied Sciences, 2021, v. 11 n. 9, p. article no. 3996 How to Cite?
AbstractThe objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literatures on the effect of treatment combining 9300 nm carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers and fluoride on prevention of enamel caries. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keywords were ((9300 nm) OR (9.3 µm) OR (carbon dioxide laser) OR (carbon dioxide lasers) OR (CO2 laser) OR (CO2 lasers)) AND ((fluoride) OR (fluorides)) AND ((dental caries) OR (caries) OR (remineralization) OR (remineralization) OR (demineralization) OR (demineralization)). Meta-analysis was performed to compare the change in mineral content by laser irradiation and fluoride treatment (F + L) with that of fluoride treatment (F) and laser treatment (L). The search identified 946 potential publications and five laboratory studies using a chemical model for cariogenic challenge and determining mineral loss of the enamel were included in this review. Meta-analysis comparing F + L with L on enamel showed a standard mean difference of −1.58 (CI: −2.13, −1.03). Meta-analysis comparing F + L with F on enamel showed a standard mean difference of −1.84 (CI: −2.30, −1.39), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 49%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, F + L was better than L and F in preventing enamel demineralization.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300296
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.838
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.435
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXUE, VW-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, IS-
dc.contributor.authorYin, IX-
dc.contributor.authorNiu, JY-
dc.contributor.authorLo, ECM-
dc.contributor.authorChu, CH-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T08:40:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T08:40:56Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences, 2021, v. 11 n. 9, p. article no. 3996-
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300296-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literatures on the effect of treatment combining 9300 nm carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers and fluoride on prevention of enamel caries. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keywords were ((9300 nm) OR (9.3 µm) OR (carbon dioxide laser) OR (carbon dioxide lasers) OR (CO2 laser) OR (CO2 lasers)) AND ((fluoride) OR (fluorides)) AND ((dental caries) OR (caries) OR (remineralization) OR (remineralization) OR (demineralization) OR (demineralization)). Meta-analysis was performed to compare the change in mineral content by laser irradiation and fluoride treatment (F + L) with that of fluoride treatment (F) and laser treatment (L). The search identified 946 potential publications and five laboratory studies using a chemical model for cariogenic challenge and determining mineral loss of the enamel were included in this review. Meta-analysis comparing F + L with L on enamel showed a standard mean difference of −1.58 (CI: −2.13, −1.03). Meta-analysis comparing F + L with F on enamel showed a standard mean difference of −1.84 (CI: −2.30, −1.39), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 49%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, F + L was better than L and F in preventing enamel demineralization.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectfluoride-
dc.subjectcaries-
dc.subjectprevention-
dc.subjectlaser-
dc.subjectenamel-
dc.titleEffects of Treatment Combining 9300 nm Carbon Dioxide Lasers and Fluoride on Prevention of Enamel Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYin, IX: irisxyin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLo, ECM: edward-lo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChu, CH: chchu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLo, ECM=rp00015-
dc.identifier.authorityChu, CH=rp00022-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11093996-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85105734981-
dc.identifier.hkuros322606-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 3996-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 3996-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000649867100001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats