File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions

TitleTheory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions
Authors
Issue Date2002
Citation
West European Politics, 2002, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-22 How to Cite?
AbstractThe article summarises the analytical frameworks, questions, and empirical findings of the volume. It defines the key concepts used. It then sets out the principal-agent framework that explains delegation to NMIs through functional logics for principals. It sets out alternative explanations based on sociological and historical institutionalism. Thereafter, it relates the empirical findings of the volume to these wider debates about delegation. It argues that although functional demands for delegation can almost always be identified, purely functional accounts of delegation to NMIs are inadequate. Explaining the decision to delegate and the institutional forms of that delegation involves including and specifying interests, policy learning/institutional isomorphism and institutional inheritances. Delegation has also had major consequences on the distribution of power, policy making processes and substantive policy choices, both through its direct effects, and via feedback effects. Finally, delegation has raised questions about the legitimacy and accountability of NMIs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300149
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.395
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThatcher, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, Alec-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:09Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationWest European Politics, 2002, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-22-
dc.identifier.issn0140-2382-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300149-
dc.description.abstractThe article summarises the analytical frameworks, questions, and empirical findings of the volume. It defines the key concepts used. It then sets out the principal-agent framework that explains delegation to NMIs through functional logics for principals. It sets out alternative explanations based on sociological and historical institutionalism. Thereafter, it relates the empirical findings of the volume to these wider debates about delegation. It argues that although functional demands for delegation can almost always be identified, purely functional accounts of delegation to NMIs are inadequate. Explaining the decision to delegate and the institutional forms of that delegation involves including and specifying interests, policy learning/institutional isomorphism and institutional inheritances. Delegation has also had major consequences on the distribution of power, policy making processes and substantive policy choices, both through its direct effects, and via feedback effects. Finally, delegation has raised questions about the legitimacy and accountability of NMIs.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofWest European Politics-
dc.titleTheory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/713601583-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036174460-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage22-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000173871400002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats