File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.588025
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85105175542
- PMID: 33935982
- WOS: WOS:000645556300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Active Microbiome Structure and Functional Analyses of Freshwater Benthic Biofilm Samples Influenced by RNA Extraction Methods
Title | Active Microbiome Structure and Functional Analyses of Freshwater Benthic Biofilm Samples Influenced by RNA Extraction Methods |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | RNA extraction benthic biofilms freshwater ecosystems method comparison 16S rRNA gene sequencing |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/microbiology/ |
Citation | Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, v. 12, p. article no. 588025 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled extensive studies of freshwater biofilms and significant breakthroughs in biofilm meta-omics. To date, however, no standardized protocols have been developed for the effective isolation of RNA from freshwater benthic biofilms. In this study, we compared column-based kit RNA extraction with five RNAzol-based extractions, differentiated by various protocol modifications. The RNA products were then evaluated to determine their integrity, purity and yield and were subjected to meta-transcriptomic sequencing and analysis. Significant discrepancies in the relative abundance of active communities and structures of eukaryotic, bacterial, archaebacterial, and viral communities were observed as direct outcomes of the tested RNA extraction methods. The column isolation-based group was characterized by the highest relative abundance of Archaea and Eukaryota, while the organic isolation-based groups commonly had the highest relative abundances of Prokaryota (bacteria). Kit extraction methods provided the best outcomes in terms of high-quality RNA yield and integrity. However, these methods were deemed questionable for studies of active bacterial communities and may contribute a significant degree of bias to the interpretation of downstream meta-transcriptomic analyses. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/299128 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.065 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | YAO, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Subramanya, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Habimana, O | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-28T02:26:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-28T02:26:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, v. 12, p. article no. 588025 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-302X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/299128 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled extensive studies of freshwater biofilms and significant breakthroughs in biofilm meta-omics. To date, however, no standardized protocols have been developed for the effective isolation of RNA from freshwater benthic biofilms. In this study, we compared column-based kit RNA extraction with five RNAzol-based extractions, differentiated by various protocol modifications. The RNA products were then evaluated to determine their integrity, purity and yield and were subjected to meta-transcriptomic sequencing and analysis. Significant discrepancies in the relative abundance of active communities and structures of eukaryotic, bacterial, archaebacterial, and viral communities were observed as direct outcomes of the tested RNA extraction methods. The column isolation-based group was characterized by the highest relative abundance of Archaea and Eukaryota, while the organic isolation-based groups commonly had the highest relative abundances of Prokaryota (bacteria). Kit extraction methods provided the best outcomes in terms of high-quality RNA yield and integrity. However, these methods were deemed questionable for studies of active bacterial communities and may contribute a significant degree of bias to the interpretation of downstream meta-transcriptomic analyses. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/microbiology/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Microbiology | - |
dc.rights | This Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission. | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | RNA extraction | - |
dc.subject | benthic biofilms | - |
dc.subject | freshwater ecosystems | - |
dc.subject | method comparison | - |
dc.subject | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | - |
dc.title | Active Microbiome Structure and Functional Analyses of Freshwater Benthic Biofilm Samples Influenced by RNA Extraction Methods | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Subramanya, R: subbu36@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Habimana, O: ohabim@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Habimana, O=rp02169 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.588025 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33935982 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC8085529 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85105175542 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 322259 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 588025 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 588025 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000645556300001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Switzerland | - |