File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Double-phase-field formulation for mixed-mode fracture in rocks

TitleDouble-phase-field formulation for mixed-mode fracture in rocks
Authors
KeywordsPhase-field modeling
Mixed-mode fracture
Cohesive fracture
Frictional fracture
Rocks
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cma
Citation
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, v. 376, p. article no. 113655 How to Cite?
AbstractCracking of rocks and rock-like materials exhibits a rich variety of patterns where tensile (mode I) and shear (mode II) fractures are often interwoven. These mixed-mode fractures are usually cohesive (quasi-brittle) and frictional. Although phase-field modeling is increasingly used for rock fracture simulation, no phase-field formulation is available for cohesive and frictional mixed-mode fracture. To address this shortfall, here we develop a double-phase-field formulation that employs two different phase fields to describe cohesive tensile fracture and frictional shear fracture individually. The formulation rigorously combines the two phase fields through three approaches: (i) crack-direction-based decomposition of the strain energy into the tensile, shear, and pure compression parts, (ii) contact-dependent calculation of the potential energy, and (iii) energy-based determination of the dominant fracturing mode in each contact condition. We validate the proposed model, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with experimental data on mixed-mode fracture in rocks. The validation results demonstrate that the double-phase-field model – a combination of two quasi-brittle phase-field models – allows one to directly use material strengths measured from experiments, unlike brittle phase-field models for mixed-mode fracture in rocks. Another standout feature of the double-phase-field model is that it can simulate, and naturally distinguish between, tensile and shear fractures without complex algorithms.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/299104
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.397
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFEI, F-
dc.contributor.authorChoo, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T02:26:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-28T02:26:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, v. 376, p. article no. 113655-
dc.identifier.issn0045-7825-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/299104-
dc.description.abstractCracking of rocks and rock-like materials exhibits a rich variety of patterns where tensile (mode I) and shear (mode II) fractures are often interwoven. These mixed-mode fractures are usually cohesive (quasi-brittle) and frictional. Although phase-field modeling is increasingly used for rock fracture simulation, no phase-field formulation is available for cohesive and frictional mixed-mode fracture. To address this shortfall, here we develop a double-phase-field formulation that employs two different phase fields to describe cohesive tensile fracture and frictional shear fracture individually. The formulation rigorously combines the two phase fields through three approaches: (i) crack-direction-based decomposition of the strain energy into the tensile, shear, and pure compression parts, (ii) contact-dependent calculation of the potential energy, and (iii) energy-based determination of the dominant fracturing mode in each contact condition. We validate the proposed model, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with experimental data on mixed-mode fracture in rocks. The validation results demonstrate that the double-phase-field model – a combination of two quasi-brittle phase-field models – allows one to directly use material strengths measured from experiments, unlike brittle phase-field models for mixed-mode fracture in rocks. Another standout feature of the double-phase-field model is that it can simulate, and naturally distinguish between, tensile and shear fractures without complex algorithms.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cma-
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering-
dc.subjectPhase-field modeling-
dc.subjectMixed-mode fracture-
dc.subjectCohesive fracture-
dc.subjectFrictional fracture-
dc.subjectRocks-
dc.titleDouble-phase-field formulation for mixed-mode fracture in rocks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChoo, J: jchoo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChoo, J=rp02364-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cma.2020.113655-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85099208618-
dc.identifier.hkuros322304-
dc.identifier.volume376-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 113655-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 113655-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000618127600006-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats