File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements

TitleLongitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements
Authors
Issue Date2008
Citation
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2008, v. 49, n. 11, p. 4886-4892 How to Cite?
AbstractPURPOSE. To evaluate the longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements obtained from optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO). METHODS. Forty-five normal and 43 glaucomatous eyes of 88 subjects were analyzed in this longitudinal study. RNFL thickness was measured by OCT (StatusOCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and SLP (GDx VCC; Carl Zeiss Meditec). Neuroretinal rim area was measured by CSLO (HRT 3; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany). Three separate measurements taken over an average period of 8.8 ± 1.2 months were used to evaluate measurement variability. Reproducibility coefficient, coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and sensitivity to change [(97.5 percentile value - 2.5 percentile value)/2 · within-subject standard deviation (Sw)] of the global measures were calculated. The association between RNFL and rim area measurement variability and visual field MD (mean deviation) was evaluated with regression analysis. RESULTS. Low variability was found for global and sectorial rim area and RNFL measurements. The reproducibility coefficient, ICC, and sensitivity to change for OCT average RNFL thickness, GDx VCC TSNIT average, and HRT global rim area were 11.7 μm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.5-12.9 μm), 0.97 (0.96-0.98), 10.2 (9.2-11.4); 4.7 μm (4.2-5.1 μm), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 11.3 (10.2-12.6); and 0.22 mm (0.19-0.24 mm ), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 9.3 (8.4-10.4), respectively. No association was found between OCT (r = 0.010 [95% CI: -0.200-0.219], P = 0.924) and SLP (r = -0.034 [95% CI: -0.241-0.177], P = 0.756) RNFL thickness variances and visual field MD. The association between CSLO rim area variance and visual field MD became insignificant after adjustment for reference height variance. CONCLUSIONS. Longitudinal RNFL and neuroretinal rim measurements obtained with OCT, SLP, and CSLO have low variability. As the measurement variability does not change with the severity of glaucoma, these parameters are useful for assessment of glaucoma progression. Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. 2 2
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/298463
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.422
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Christopher Kai Shun-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Carol Yim Lui-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Dusheng-
dc.contributor.authorChi, Pui Pang-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Dennis S.C.-
dc.contributor.authorWeinreb, Robert N.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T03:08:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-08T03:08:28Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2008, v. 49, n. 11, p. 4886-4892-
dc.identifier.issn0146-0404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/298463-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. To evaluate the longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements obtained from optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO). METHODS. Forty-five normal and 43 glaucomatous eyes of 88 subjects were analyzed in this longitudinal study. RNFL thickness was measured by OCT (StatusOCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and SLP (GDx VCC; Carl Zeiss Meditec). Neuroretinal rim area was measured by CSLO (HRT 3; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany). Three separate measurements taken over an average period of 8.8 ± 1.2 months were used to evaluate measurement variability. Reproducibility coefficient, coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and sensitivity to change [(97.5 percentile value - 2.5 percentile value)/2 · within-subject standard deviation (Sw)] of the global measures were calculated. The association between RNFL and rim area measurement variability and visual field MD (mean deviation) was evaluated with regression analysis. RESULTS. Low variability was found for global and sectorial rim area and RNFL measurements. The reproducibility coefficient, ICC, and sensitivity to change for OCT average RNFL thickness, GDx VCC TSNIT average, and HRT global rim area were 11.7 μm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.5-12.9 μm), 0.97 (0.96-0.98), 10.2 (9.2-11.4); 4.7 μm (4.2-5.1 μm), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 11.3 (10.2-12.6); and 0.22 mm (0.19-0.24 mm ), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 9.3 (8.4-10.4), respectively. No association was found between OCT (r = 0.010 [95% CI: -0.200-0.219], P = 0.924) and SLP (r = -0.034 [95% CI: -0.241-0.177], P = 0.756) RNFL thickness variances and visual field MD. The association between CSLO rim area variance and visual field MD became insignificant after adjustment for reference height variance. CONCLUSIONS. Longitudinal RNFL and neuroretinal rim measurements obtained with OCT, SLP, and CSLO have low variability. As the measurement variability does not change with the severity of glaucoma, these parameters are useful for assessment of glaucoma progression. Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. 2 2-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science-
dc.titleLongitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/iovs.07-1187-
dc.identifier.pmid18539940-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-56149104617-
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage4886-
dc.identifier.epage4892-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-5783-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000260502200028-
dc.identifier.issnl0146-0404-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats