File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-34250648821
- PMID: 17586372
- WOS: WOS:000247948200016
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia
Title | Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Citation | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2007, v. 33, n. 7, p. 1177-1182 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To compare corneal pachymetry assessment using 4 measurement methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR. Methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients (103 eyes) who had LASIK for the correction of myopia had Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb), Visante (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonomed, 200P) 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression. Results: The mean postoperative pachymetry measured by US, Orbscan (0.89 acoustic factor), Pentacam, and Visante pachymetry were 438.2 μm ± 41.18 (SD), 435.17 ± 49.63 μm, 430.66 ± 40.23 μm, and 426.56 ± 41.6 μm, respectively. Compared with the US measurement, Pentacam and Visante measurements significantly underestimated corneal thickness by a mean of 7.54 ± 15.06 μm (P<.01) and 11.64 ± 12.87 μm (P<.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between US and Orbscan measurements. Conclusion: Pentacam and Visante measurements of corneal thickness 6 months after LASIK were significantly less than those obtained using Orbscan and US pachymetry, although all 4 measurement methods showed a high correlation with each other. © 2007 ASCRS and ESCRS. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/298397 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.472 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Thomas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Arthur C.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rao, Srinivas K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Silvania | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, Chris K.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Dennis S.C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-08T03:08:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-08T03:08:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2007, v. 33, n. 7, p. 1177-1182 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0886-3350 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/298397 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare corneal pachymetry assessment using 4 measurement methods in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR. Methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients (103 eyes) who had LASIK for the correction of myopia had Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb), Visante (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonomed, 200P) 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using the paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression. Results: The mean postoperative pachymetry measured by US, Orbscan (0.89 acoustic factor), Pentacam, and Visante pachymetry were 438.2 μm ± 41.18 (SD), 435.17 ± 49.63 μm, 430.66 ± 40.23 μm, and 426.56 ± 41.6 μm, respectively. Compared with the US measurement, Pentacam and Visante measurements significantly underestimated corneal thickness by a mean of 7.54 ± 15.06 μm (P<.01) and 11.64 ± 12.87 μm (P<.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between US and Orbscan measurements. Conclusion: Pentacam and Visante measurements of corneal thickness 6 months after LASIK were significantly less than those obtained using Orbscan and US pachymetry, although all 4 measurement methods showed a high correlation with each other. © 2007 ASCRS and ESCRS. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | - |
dc.title | Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17586372 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-34250648821 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1177 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1182 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000247948200016 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0886-3350 | - |