File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching

TitleA systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching
Authors
KeywordsShade matching
Colorimeter
Spectrophotometer
Digital imaging
Visual
Issue Date2012
Citation
Quintessence International, 2012, v. 43, n. 8, p. 649-659 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Common methods for matching tooth shade can be classified into two categories: visual and instrumental measurements. This systematic review evaluated these two methods in terms of precision and accuracy using the agreement percentage rate. Method and Materials: The following databases were searched for studiss comparing different shade-matching methods: MEDLINE (PubMed). Embase. and Google Scholar. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Screening, data abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Seventeen studiss provided data on the precision of the evaluated shade-matching methods, eight provided data on accuracy, and one provided data on both precision and accuracy. Conclusion: Instrumental measurements using a spectrophotometer may provide the most precise and accurate shade-matching outcomes. However, the limitations of the available articles suggest that high-quality studies are still needed verify this claim. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297332
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.487
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hui-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorDong, Xian-
dc.contributor.authorQian, Jielei-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Jiajing-
dc.contributor.authorQu, Xinhua-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Eryi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T07:33:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-15T07:33:32Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence International, 2012, v. 43, n. 8, p. 649-659-
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297332-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Common methods for matching tooth shade can be classified into two categories: visual and instrumental measurements. This systematic review evaluated these two methods in terms of precision and accuracy using the agreement percentage rate. Method and Materials: The following databases were searched for studiss comparing different shade-matching methods: MEDLINE (PubMed). Embase. and Google Scholar. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Screening, data abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Seventeen studiss provided data on the precision of the evaluated shade-matching methods, eight provided data on accuracy, and one provided data on both precision and accuracy. Conclusion: Instrumental measurements using a spectrophotometer may provide the most precise and accurate shade-matching outcomes. However, the limitations of the available articles suggest that high-quality studies are still needed verify this claim. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence International-
dc.subjectShade matching-
dc.subjectColorimeter-
dc.subjectSpectrophotometer-
dc.subjectDigital imaging-
dc.subjectVisual-
dc.titleA systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid23034418-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84886786180-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage649-
dc.identifier.epage659-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000317585100004-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-6572-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats