File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84886786180
- PMID: 23034418
- WOS: WOS:000317585100004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching
Title | A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Shade matching Colorimeter Spectrophotometer Digital imaging Visual |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Quintessence International, 2012, v. 43, n. 8, p. 649-659 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: Common methods for matching tooth shade can be classified into two categories: visual and instrumental measurements. This systematic review evaluated these two methods in terms of precision and accuracy using the agreement percentage rate. Method and Materials: The following databases were searched for studiss comparing different shade-matching methods: MEDLINE (PubMed). Embase. and Google Scholar. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Screening, data abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Seventeen studiss provided data on the precision of the evaluated shade-matching methods, eight provided data on accuracy, and one provided data on both precision and accuracy. Conclusion: Instrumental measurements using a spectrophotometer may provide the most precise and accurate shade-matching outcomes. However, the limitations of the available articles suggest that high-quality studies are still needed verify this claim. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/297332 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.487 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Hui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Jing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dong, Xian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qian, Jielei | - |
dc.contributor.author | He, Jiajing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qu, Xinhua | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Eryi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-15T07:33:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-15T07:33:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Quintessence International, 2012, v. 43, n. 8, p. 649-659 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-6572 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/297332 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Common methods for matching tooth shade can be classified into two categories: visual and instrumental measurements. This systematic review evaluated these two methods in terms of precision and accuracy using the agreement percentage rate. Method and Materials: The following databases were searched for studiss comparing different shade-matching methods: MEDLINE (PubMed). Embase. and Google Scholar. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. Screening, data abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Seventeen studiss provided data on the precision of the evaluated shade-matching methods, eight provided data on accuracy, and one provided data on both precision and accuracy. Conclusion: Instrumental measurements using a spectrophotometer may provide the most precise and accurate shade-matching outcomes. However, the limitations of the available articles suggest that high-quality studies are still needed verify this claim. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Quintessence International | - |
dc.subject | Shade matching | - |
dc.subject | Colorimeter | - |
dc.subject | Spectrophotometer | - |
dc.subject | Digital imaging | - |
dc.subject | Visual | - |
dc.title | A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23034418 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84886786180 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 649 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 659 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000317585100004 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0033-6572 | - |