File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is the lack of smartphone data skewing wealth indices in low-income settings?

TitleIs the lack of smartphone data skewing wealth indices in low-income settings?
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/start.asp
Citation
Population Health Metrics, 2021, v. 19 n. 1, p. article no. 4 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground Smartphones have rapidly become an important marker of wealth in low- and middle-income countries, but international household surveys do not regularly gather data on smartphone ownership and these data are rarely used to calculate wealth indices. Methods We developed a cross-sectional survey module delivered to 3028 households in rural northwest Burkina Faso to measure the effects of this absence. Wealth indices were calculated using both principal components analysis (PCA) and polychoric PCA for a base model using only ownership of any cell phone, and a full model using data on smartphone ownership, the number of cell phones, and the purchase of mobile data. Four outcomes (household expenditure, education level, and prevalence of frailty and diabetes) were used to evaluate changes in the composition of wealth index quintiles using ordinary least squares and logistic regressions and Wald tests. Results Households that own smartphones have higher monthly expenditures and own a greater quantity and quality of household assets. Expenditure and education levels are significantly higher at the fifth (richest) socioeconomic status (SES) quintile of full model wealth indices as compared to base models. Similarly, diabetes prevalence is significantly higher at the fifth SES quintile using PCA wealth index full models, but this is not observed for frailty prevalence, which is more prevalent among lower SES households. These effects are not present when using polychoric PCA, suggesting that this method provides additional robustness to missing asset data to measure underlying latent SES by proxy. Conclusions The lack of smartphone data can skew PCA-based wealth index performance in a low-income context for the top of the socioeconomic spectrum. While some PCA variants may be robust to the omission of smartphone ownership, eliciting smartphone ownership data in household surveys is likely to substantially improve the validity and utility of wealth estimates. Keywords Author Keywords:Wealth index; Smartphones; Socioeconomic status; Principal components analysis; Burkina Faso
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297149
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.646
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoirier, MJP-
dc.contributor.authorBarninghausen, T-
dc.contributor.authorHarling, G-
dc.contributor.authorSie, A-
dc.contributor.authorGrepin, KA-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T07:14:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T07:14:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPopulation Health Metrics, 2021, v. 19 n. 1, p. article no. 4-
dc.identifier.issn1478-7954-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297149-
dc.description.abstractBackground Smartphones have rapidly become an important marker of wealth in low- and middle-income countries, but international household surveys do not regularly gather data on smartphone ownership and these data are rarely used to calculate wealth indices. Methods We developed a cross-sectional survey module delivered to 3028 households in rural northwest Burkina Faso to measure the effects of this absence. Wealth indices were calculated using both principal components analysis (PCA) and polychoric PCA for a base model using only ownership of any cell phone, and a full model using data on smartphone ownership, the number of cell phones, and the purchase of mobile data. Four outcomes (household expenditure, education level, and prevalence of frailty and diabetes) were used to evaluate changes in the composition of wealth index quintiles using ordinary least squares and logistic regressions and Wald tests. Results Households that own smartphones have higher monthly expenditures and own a greater quantity and quality of household assets. Expenditure and education levels are significantly higher at the fifth (richest) socioeconomic status (SES) quintile of full model wealth indices as compared to base models. Similarly, diabetes prevalence is significantly higher at the fifth SES quintile using PCA wealth index full models, but this is not observed for frailty prevalence, which is more prevalent among lower SES households. These effects are not present when using polychoric PCA, suggesting that this method provides additional robustness to missing asset data to measure underlying latent SES by proxy. Conclusions The lack of smartphone data can skew PCA-based wealth index performance in a low-income context for the top of the socioeconomic spectrum. While some PCA variants may be robust to the omission of smartphone ownership, eliciting smartphone ownership data in household surveys is likely to substantially improve the validity and utility of wealth estimates. Keywords Author Keywords:Wealth index; Smartphones; Socioeconomic status; Principal components analysis; Burkina Faso-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/start.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation Health Metrics-
dc.rightsPopulation Health Metrics. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleIs the lack of smartphone data skewing wealth indices in low-income settings?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGrepin, KA: kgrepin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGrepin, KA=rp02646-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12963-021-00246-3-
dc.identifier.pmid33526039-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7852097-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85100257126-
dc.identifier.hkuros321547-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 4-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 4-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000613722700001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats