File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Examining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: An urban environment case

TitleExamining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: An urban environment case
Authors
Issue Date2004
Citation
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, v. 25, n. 11, p. 2177-2192 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate spatial resolution effects on image classification. Classification maps were generated with a maximum likelihood (ML) classifier applied to three multi-spectral bands and variance texture images. A total of eight urban land use/cover classes were obtained at six spatial resolution levels based on a series of aggregated Colour Infrared Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quadrangle (DOQQ) subsets in urban and rural fringe areas of the San Diego metropolitan area. The classification results were compared using overall and individual classification accuracies. Classification accuracies were shown to be influenced by image spatial resolution, window size used in texture extraction and differences in spatial structure within and between categories. The more heterogeneous are the land use/cover units and the more fragmented are the landscapes, the finer the resolution required. Texture was more effective for improving the classification accuracy of land use classes at finer resolution levels. For spectrally homogeneous classes, a small window is preferable. But for spectrally heterogeneous classes, a large window size is required. © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296579
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.776
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, D.-
dc.contributor.authorStow, D. A.-
dc.contributor.authorGong, P.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:12Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, v. 25, n. 11, p. 2177-2192-
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296579-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate spatial resolution effects on image classification. Classification maps were generated with a maximum likelihood (ML) classifier applied to three multi-spectral bands and variance texture images. A total of eight urban land use/cover classes were obtained at six spatial resolution levels based on a series of aggregated Colour Infrared Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quadrangle (DOQQ) subsets in urban and rural fringe areas of the San Diego metropolitan area. The classification results were compared using overall and individual classification accuracies. Classification accuracies were shown to be influenced by image spatial resolution, window size used in texture extraction and differences in spatial structure within and between categories. The more heterogeneous are the land use/cover units and the more fragmented are the landscapes, the finer the resolution required. Texture was more effective for improving the classification accuracy of land use classes at finer resolution levels. For spectrally homogeneous classes, a small window is preferable. But for spectrally heterogeneous classes, a large window size is required. © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensing-
dc.titleExamining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: An urban environment case-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01431160310001618464-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-2942586682-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage2177-
dc.identifier.epage2192-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000221428900012-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-1161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats