File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Performance analyses of probabilistic relaxation methods for land-cover classification

TitlePerformance analyses of probabilistic relaxation methods for land-cover classification
Authors
Issue Date1989
Citation
Remote Sensing of Environment, 1989, v. 30, n. 1, p. 33-42 How to Cite?
AbstractThe performances of two probabilistic relaxation (PR) classification methods, a standard and a modified version, are assessed in terms of classification accuracy measured by the Kappa coefficient and the CPU time required to carry out the computation. The classification results obtained with these methods are compared with results obtained using conventional maximum-likelihood classification (MLC). Experiments indicate that the modified PR method significantly improves upon the classification results generated by the MLC method. The modified PR method saves up to 70% of the CPU time, compared with the standard PR method, and also gives slightly better classification accuracy. © 1989.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296493
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGong, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, Philip J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:01Z-
dc.date.issued1989-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment, 1989, v. 30, n. 1, p. 33-42-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296493-
dc.description.abstractThe performances of two probabilistic relaxation (PR) classification methods, a standard and a modified version, are assessed in terms of classification accuracy measured by the Kappa coefficient and the CPU time required to carry out the computation. The classification results obtained with these methods are compared with results obtained using conventional maximum-likelihood classification (MLC). Experiments indicate that the modified PR method significantly improves upon the classification results generated by the MLC method. The modified PR method saves up to 70% of the CPU time, compared with the standard PR method, and also gives slightly better classification accuracy. © 1989.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing of Environment-
dc.titlePerformance analyses of probabilistic relaxation methods for land-cover classification-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0034-4257(89)90045-X-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0024752431-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage33-
dc.identifier.epage42-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1989DC59600003-
dc.identifier.issnl0034-4257-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats