File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks

TitleProduct Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks
Authors
Keywordsoperations strategy
product distribution
product recall
supply disruption
Issue Date2020
Citation
Production and Operations Management, 2020, v. 29, n. 1, p. 9-23 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 Production and Operations Management Society When product recalls happen, firms not only have to incur additional logistics costs but also suffer from a damaged reputation. Besides, they may also supply disruption risk, under which a supplier could fail to deliver the quantity ordered at all. In this study, we discuss how to mitigate supply disruption and recall risks in the perspective of (outbound) product distribution strategy in joint with (inbound) sourcing decision. Specifically, we compare the dedicated and uniform distribution strategies as follows: in the dedicated strategy, the firm divides its market into several regions, and ships products from different suppliers based on the regions; whereas, in the uniform strategy, the firm serves the entire market by randomly shipping the products from several suppliers without distinguishing their sources. Through the comparison of both strategies, we show that the role of recall risk is different from that of supply disruption on the sourcing and distribution decision. In particular, single sourcing is optimal when both recall risk and disruption probability are low; dual sourcing with the dedicated strategy is optimal when the disruption probability is moderate and the recall risk is high; dual sourcing with the uniform strategy is optimal when the disruption probability is high. We also find that the positive correlation in recalls improves (undermines) the performance of the uniform (dedicated) strategy. In contrast, the positive correlation in supply disruptions only undermines the performance of the uniform strategy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296198
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.035
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Long-
dc.contributor.authorRong, Ying-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Zuo Jun Max-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T04:53:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-11T04:53:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationProduction and Operations Management, 2020, v. 29, n. 1, p. 9-23-
dc.identifier.issn1059-1478-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296198-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Production and Operations Management Society When product recalls happen, firms not only have to incur additional logistics costs but also suffer from a damaged reputation. Besides, they may also supply disruption risk, under which a supplier could fail to deliver the quantity ordered at all. In this study, we discuss how to mitigate supply disruption and recall risks in the perspective of (outbound) product distribution strategy in joint with (inbound) sourcing decision. Specifically, we compare the dedicated and uniform distribution strategies as follows: in the dedicated strategy, the firm divides its market into several regions, and ships products from different suppliers based on the regions; whereas, in the uniform strategy, the firm serves the entire market by randomly shipping the products from several suppliers without distinguishing their sources. Through the comparison of both strategies, we show that the role of recall risk is different from that of supply disruption on the sourcing and distribution decision. In particular, single sourcing is optimal when both recall risk and disruption probability are low; dual sourcing with the dedicated strategy is optimal when the disruption probability is moderate and the recall risk is high; dual sourcing with the uniform strategy is optimal when the disruption probability is high. We also find that the positive correlation in recalls improves (undermines) the performance of the uniform (dedicated) strategy. In contrast, the positive correlation in supply disruptions only undermines the performance of the uniform strategy.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProduction and Operations Management-
dc.subjectoperations strategy-
dc.subjectproduct distribution-
dc.subjectproduct recall-
dc.subjectsupply disruption-
dc.titleProduct Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/poms.13065-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85070978315-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage9-
dc.identifier.epage23-
dc.identifier.eissn1937-5956-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000505769600001-
dc.identifier.issnl1059-1478-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats