File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Measuring fear: Association among different measures of fear learning

TitleMeasuring fear: Association among different measures of fear learning
Authors
KeywordsDifferential fear conditioning
Skin conductance
US-expectancies
Affective ratings
Issue Date2021
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbtep
Citation
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2021, v. 70, p. article no. 101618 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground and objectives: Fear conditioning paradigms use various measures to assess learned fear, including autonomic arousal responses like skin conductance, and self-reports of both associative (US-expectancies) and evaluative (affective ratings) learning. The present study uses a dimensional approach to examine associations among fear indices directly. Methods: Seventy-three participants completed a differential fear conditioning experiment, during which a neutral stimulus (CS+) was paired with an electric shock (US), while another stimulus (CS-) was never paired with the shock (partially instructed fear acquisition). Ten minutes later, both stimuli were presented without any shocks (fear extinction). Skin conductance responses and US-expectancy ratings were recorded during each phase, while self-reported negative affect was assessed for each CS at the end of extinction. Results: Results showed a positive association among US-expectancy ratings and skin conductance responses during acquisition and early extinction. US-expectancy ratings during overall extinction were positively associated with post-extinction negative affect. Limitations: The lack of affective ratings post-acquisition may have obscured associations between associative and evaluative learning indices. Conclusions: Results provide evidence for the expected correspondence among different indices of associative fear learning. Findings emphasize the need for incorporating both associative and evaluative learning measures in fear conditioning paradigms.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293625
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.674
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, E-
dc.contributor.authorPurves, KL-
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, T-
dc.contributor.authorLester, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorBarry, TJ-
dc.contributor.authorTreanor, M-
dc.contributor.authorCraske, MG-
dc.contributor.authorEley, TC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:19:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:19:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2021, v. 70, p. article no. 101618-
dc.identifier.issn0005-7916-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293625-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: Fear conditioning paradigms use various measures to assess learned fear, including autonomic arousal responses like skin conductance, and self-reports of both associative (US-expectancies) and evaluative (affective ratings) learning. The present study uses a dimensional approach to examine associations among fear indices directly. Methods: Seventy-three participants completed a differential fear conditioning experiment, during which a neutral stimulus (CS+) was paired with an electric shock (US), while another stimulus (CS-) was never paired with the shock (partially instructed fear acquisition). Ten minutes later, both stimuli were presented without any shocks (fear extinction). Skin conductance responses and US-expectancy ratings were recorded during each phase, while self-reported negative affect was assessed for each CS at the end of extinction. Results: Results showed a positive association among US-expectancy ratings and skin conductance responses during acquisition and early extinction. US-expectancy ratings during overall extinction were positively associated with post-extinction negative affect. Limitations: The lack of affective ratings post-acquisition may have obscured associations between associative and evaluative learning indices. Conclusions: Results provide evidence for the expected correspondence among different indices of associative fear learning. Findings emphasize the need for incorporating both associative and evaluative learning measures in fear conditioning paradigms.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbtep-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectDifferential fear conditioning-
dc.subjectSkin conductance-
dc.subjectUS-expectancies-
dc.subjectAffective ratings-
dc.titleMeasuring fear: Association among different measures of fear learning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBarry, TJ: tjbarry@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBarry, TJ=rp02277-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101618-
dc.identifier.pmid33039814-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7689577-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85092261334-
dc.identifier.hkuros319398-
dc.identifier.volume70-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 101618-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 101618-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000664040700007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0005-7916-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats