File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Prediction errors in surface segmentation are reflected in the visual mismatch negativity, independently of task and surface features

TitlePrediction errors in surface segmentation are reflected in the visual mismatch negativity, independently of task and surface features
Authors
KeywordsEEG
visual mismatch negativity
object perception
surface segmentation
roving standard
Issue Date2019
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/
Citation
Journal of Vision, 2019, v. 19 n. 6, p. article no. 9 How to Cite?
AbstractThe visual system quickly registers perceptual regularities in the environment and responds to violations in these patterns. Errors of perceptual prediction are associated with electrocortical modulation, including the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) and P2 event-related potential. One relatively unexplored question is whether these prediction error signals can encode higher-level properties such as surface segmentation, or whether they are limited to lower-level perceptual features. Using a roving standard paradigm, a triangle surface appeared either behind (featuring amodal contours) or in front of (featuring real contours) a second surface with hole-like windows. A surface layout appeared for two to five repetitions before switching to the other ‘‘deviant’’ layout; lighting and orientation of stimuli varied across presentations while remaining isoluminant. Observers responded when they detected a rare ‘‘pinched’’ triangle, which occasionally appeared. Cortical activity—reflected in mismatch responses affecting the P2–N2 and P300 amplitudes—was sensitive to a change in stimulus layout, when surfaces shifted position in depth, following several repetitions. Specifically, layout deviants led to a more negative P2–N2 complex at posterior electrodes, and greater P300 positivity at central sites. Independently of these signals of a deviant surface layout, further modulations of the P2 encoded differences between layouts and detection of the rare target stimulus. Comparison of the effect of preceding layout repetitions on this prediction error signal suggests that it is all or none and not graded with respect to the number of previous repetitions. We show that within the visual domain, unnoticed and task-irrelevant changes in visual surface segmentation leads to observable electrophysiological signals of prediction error that are dissociable from stimulus-specific encoding and lower- level perceptual processing.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293242
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.849
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOxner, M-
dc.contributor.authorRosentreter, ET-
dc.contributor.authorHayward, WG-
dc.contributor.authorCorballis, PM-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:13:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:13:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Vision, 2019, v. 19 n. 6, p. article no. 9-
dc.identifier.issn1534-7362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293242-
dc.description.abstractThe visual system quickly registers perceptual regularities in the environment and responds to violations in these patterns. Errors of perceptual prediction are associated with electrocortical modulation, including the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) and P2 event-related potential. One relatively unexplored question is whether these prediction error signals can encode higher-level properties such as surface segmentation, or whether they are limited to lower-level perceptual features. Using a roving standard paradigm, a triangle surface appeared either behind (featuring amodal contours) or in front of (featuring real contours) a second surface with hole-like windows. A surface layout appeared for two to five repetitions before switching to the other ‘‘deviant’’ layout; lighting and orientation of stimuli varied across presentations while remaining isoluminant. Observers responded when they detected a rare ‘‘pinched’’ triangle, which occasionally appeared. Cortical activity—reflected in mismatch responses affecting the P2–N2 and P300 amplitudes—was sensitive to a change in stimulus layout, when surfaces shifted position in depth, following several repetitions. Specifically, layout deviants led to a more negative P2–N2 complex at posterior electrodes, and greater P300 positivity at central sites. Independently of these signals of a deviant surface layout, further modulations of the P2 encoded differences between layouts and detection of the rare target stimulus. Comparison of the effect of preceding layout repetitions on this prediction error signal suggests that it is all or none and not graded with respect to the number of previous repetitions. We show that within the visual domain, unnoticed and task-irrelevant changes in visual surface segmentation leads to observable electrophysiological signals of prediction error that are dissociable from stimulus-specific encoding and lower- level perceptual processing.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vision-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEEG-
dc.subjectvisual mismatch negativity-
dc.subjectobject perception-
dc.subjectsurface segmentation-
dc.subjectroving standard-
dc.titlePrediction errors in surface segmentation are reflected in the visual mismatch negativity, independently of task and surface features-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHayward, WG: whayward@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHayward, WG=rp00630-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/19.6.9-
dc.identifier.pmid31185097-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85067346975-
dc.identifier.hkuros320203-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 9-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 9-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000472717100009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl1534-7362-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats