File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The evolution and adaptive potential of transcriptional variation in sticklebacks - Signatures of selection and widespread heritability

TitleThe evolution and adaptive potential of transcriptional variation in sticklebacks - Signatures of selection and widespread heritability
Authors
KeywordsGene expression
Quantitative genetics
Microarray
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Q ST
Transcriptome
Issue Date2015
Citation
Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2015, v. 32, n. 3, p. 674-689 How to Cite?
AbstractEvidence implicating differential gene expression as a significant driver of evolutionary novelty continues to accumulate, but our understanding of the underlying sources of variation in expression, both environmental and genetic, is wanting. Heritability in particular may be underestimated when inferred from genetic mapping studies, the predominant "genetical genomics" approach to the study of expression variation. Such uncertainty represents a fundamental limitation to testing for adaptive evolution at the transcriptomic level. By studying the inheritance of expression levels in 10,495 genes (10,527 splice variants) in a three spine stickleback pedigree consisting of 563 individuals, half of which were subjected to a thermal treatment, we show that 74-98% of transcripts exhibit significant additive genetic variance. Dominance variance is also prevalent (41-99% of transcripts), and genetic sources of variation seem to play a more significant role in expression variance in the liver than a key environmental variable, temperature. Among-population comparisons suggest that the majority of differential expression in the liver is likely due to neutral divergence; however, we also show that signatures of directional selection may be more prevalent than those of stabilizing selection. This predominantly aligns with the neutral model of evolution for gene expression but also suggests that natural selectionmay still act on transcriptional variation in the wild. As genetic variation both within- and among-populations ultimately defines adaptive potential, these results indicate that broad adaptive potential may be found within the transcriptome.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292957
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.061
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeder, Erica H.-
dc.contributor.authorMcCairns, R. J.Scott-
dc.contributor.authorLeinonen, Tuomas-
dc.contributor.authorCano, José M.-
dc.contributor.authorViitaniemi, Heidi M.-
dc.contributor.authorNikinmaa, Mikko-
dc.contributor.authorPrimmer, Craig R.-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:57:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:57:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2015, v. 32, n. 3, p. 674-689-
dc.identifier.issn0737-4038-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292957-
dc.description.abstractEvidence implicating differential gene expression as a significant driver of evolutionary novelty continues to accumulate, but our understanding of the underlying sources of variation in expression, both environmental and genetic, is wanting. Heritability in particular may be underestimated when inferred from genetic mapping studies, the predominant "genetical genomics" approach to the study of expression variation. Such uncertainty represents a fundamental limitation to testing for adaptive evolution at the transcriptomic level. By studying the inheritance of expression levels in 10,495 genes (10,527 splice variants) in a three spine stickleback pedigree consisting of 563 individuals, half of which were subjected to a thermal treatment, we show that 74-98% of transcripts exhibit significant additive genetic variance. Dominance variance is also prevalent (41-99% of transcripts), and genetic sources of variation seem to play a more significant role in expression variance in the liver than a key environmental variable, temperature. Among-population comparisons suggest that the majority of differential expression in the liver is likely due to neutral divergence; however, we also show that signatures of directional selection may be more prevalent than those of stabilizing selection. This predominantly aligns with the neutral model of evolution for gene expression but also suggests that natural selectionmay still act on transcriptional variation in the wild. As genetic variation both within- and among-populations ultimately defines adaptive potential, these results indicate that broad adaptive potential may be found within the transcriptome.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Biology and Evolution-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectGene expression-
dc.subjectQuantitative genetics-
dc.subjectMicroarray-
dc.subjectGasterosteus aculeatus-
dc.subjectQ ST-
dc.subjectTranscriptome-
dc.titleThe evolution and adaptive potential of transcriptional variation in sticklebacks - Signatures of selection and widespread heritability-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/molbev/msu328-
dc.identifier.pmid25429004-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4327155-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84982189674-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage674-
dc.identifier.epage689-
dc.identifier.eissn1537-1719-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000350908500011-
dc.identifier.issnl0737-4038-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats