Baiting improves CPUE in nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) minnow trap fishery

Abstract

Whether or not baiting influences stickleback catch per unit effort (CPUE) remains a matter of debate among stickleback researchers: While the opinions about the impact of baiting on CPUE differ, supporting quantitative data are scarce. The effect of baiting and trap type on nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) CPUE was studied in a field experiment conducted over four consecutive days in a small pond in northeastern Finland. The results show that baited traps yielded better (mean CPUE = 1.24 fish/trap/d) catches than unbaited traps (mean CPUE = 0.66); however, there were also differences in CPUE depending on the type of collapsible trap that was used. The trap type effect on CPUE seemed to differ among age classes - the finer meshed trap caught more young-of-the-year fish than the coarse-meshed one, whereas the opposite was true for the older and larger individuals. The results agree with those of an earlier more restricted study conducted in the same locality: Together, these results provide strong evidence for the positive impact of baiting on nine-spined stickleback CPUE. Whether or not baiting influences catch per unit effort (CPUE) in stickleback fisheries remains a matter of debate among researchers in lack of quantitative data. A field experiment conducted with nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) shows that bating improves CPUE. CPUE is also influenced by trap type, and CPUE of different size and age classes of fish differ depending on the trap type.