File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Population divergence in compensatory growth responses and their costs in sticklebacks

TitlePopulation divergence in compensatory growth responses and their costs in sticklebacks
Authors
KeywordsBody size
Population differentiation
Stickleback
Compensatory growth
Issue Date2015
Citation
Ecology and Evolution, 2015, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7-23 How to Cite?
AbstractCompensatory growth (CG) may be an adaptive mechanism that helps to restore an organisms' growth trajectory and adult size from deviations caused by early life resource limitation. Yet, few studies have investigated the genetic basis of CG potential and existence of genetically based population differentiation in CG potential. We studied population differentiation, genetic basis, and costs of CG potential in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) differing in their normal growth patterns. As selection favors large body size in pond and small body size in marine populations, we expected CG to occur in the pond but not in the marine population. By manipulating feeding conditions (viz. high, low and recovery feeding treatments), we found clear evidence for CG in the pond but not in the marine population, as well as evidence for catch-up growth (i.e., size compensation without growth acceleration) in both populations. In the marine population, overcompensation occurred individuals from the recovery treatment grew eventually larger than those from the high feeding treatment. In both populations, the recovery feeding treatment reduced maturation probability. The recovery feeding treatment also reduced survival probability in the marine but not in the pond population. Analysis of interpopulation hybrids further suggested that both genetic and maternal effects contributed to the population differences in CG. Hence, apart from demonstrating intrinsic costs for recovery growth, both genetic and maternal effects were identified to be important modulators of CG responses. The results provide an evidence for adaptive differentiation in recovery growth potential.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292859
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAb Ghani, Nurul Izza-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:57:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:57:22Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationEcology and Evolution, 2015, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7-23-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292859-
dc.description.abstractCompensatory growth (CG) may be an adaptive mechanism that helps to restore an organisms' growth trajectory and adult size from deviations caused by early life resource limitation. Yet, few studies have investigated the genetic basis of CG potential and existence of genetically based population differentiation in CG potential. We studied population differentiation, genetic basis, and costs of CG potential in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) differing in their normal growth patterns. As selection favors large body size in pond and small body size in marine populations, we expected CG to occur in the pond but not in the marine population. By manipulating feeding conditions (viz. high, low and recovery feeding treatments), we found clear evidence for CG in the pond but not in the marine population, as well as evidence for catch-up growth (i.e., size compensation without growth acceleration) in both populations. In the marine population, overcompensation occurred individuals from the recovery treatment grew eventually larger than those from the high feeding treatment. In both populations, the recovery feeding treatment reduced maturation probability. The recovery feeding treatment also reduced survival probability in the marine but not in the pond population. Analysis of interpopulation hybrids further suggested that both genetic and maternal effects contributed to the population differences in CG. Hence, apart from demonstrating intrinsic costs for recovery growth, both genetic and maternal effects were identified to be important modulators of CG responses. The results provide an evidence for adaptive differentiation in recovery growth potential.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEcology and Evolution-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBody size-
dc.subjectPopulation differentiation-
dc.subjectStickleback-
dc.subjectCompensatory growth-
dc.titlePopulation divergence in compensatory growth responses and their costs in sticklebacks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.1342-
dc.identifier.pmid25628860-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4298429-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84920288525-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage7-
dc.identifier.epage23-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000347517300002-
dc.identifier.issnl2045-7758-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats