File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of thoracic ultrasound, clinical acumen, and radiography in patients with minor chest injury

TitleComparison of thoracic ultrasound, clinical acumen, and radiography in patients with minor chest injury
Authors
KeywordsDiagnostic imaging
Wounds
Injuries
Chest injury
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
Pain
Trauma
Issue Date2004
Citation
Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 2004, v. 56, n. 6, p. 1211-1213 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: This study was designed to compare ultrasonography, clinical findings, and radiography in the detection of rib and sternal fractures. Methods: In a prospective study, 88 patients presenting consecutively to an emergency department with isolated blunt chest injury of mild to moderate force were recruited. Results: Ultrasonography yielded a sensitivity of 80.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.5-88.5) for detecting chest wall fractures compared with sensitivities of 26.0 (95% CI, 15.8-36.3) for clinical acumen and 23.7 (95% CI, 14.7-34.8) for radiography. Conclusions: Early ultrasonography is more accurate than clinical and radiologic evaluation at detecting rib and sternal fractures.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292560
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 2.961
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRainer, Timothy H.-
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, James F.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Peggo K.W.-
dc.contributor.authorMetreweli, Constantine-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:56:44Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 2004, v. 56, n. 6, p. 1211-1213-
dc.identifier.issn0022-5282-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292560-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study was designed to compare ultrasonography, clinical findings, and radiography in the detection of rib and sternal fractures. Methods: In a prospective study, 88 patients presenting consecutively to an emergency department with isolated blunt chest injury of mild to moderate force were recruited. Results: Ultrasonography yielded a sensitivity of 80.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.5-88.5) for detecting chest wall fractures compared with sensitivities of 26.0 (95% CI, 15.8-36.3) for clinical acumen and 23.7 (95% CI, 14.7-34.8) for radiography. Conclusions: Early ultrasonography is more accurate than clinical and radiologic evaluation at detecting rib and sternal fractures.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care-
dc.subjectDiagnostic imaging-
dc.subjectWounds-
dc.subjectInjuries-
dc.subjectChest injury-
dc.subjectUltrasonography-
dc.subjectUltrasound-
dc.subjectPain-
dc.subjectTrauma-
dc.titleComparison of thoracic ultrasound, clinical acumen, and radiography in patients with minor chest injury-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.TA.0000075800.65485.48-
dc.identifier.pmid15211127-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-3142523303-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1211-
dc.identifier.epage1213-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222811100007-
dc.identifier.issnl0022-5282-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats