File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: What type of amphibian tunnel could reduce road kills?

TitleWhat type of amphibian tunnel could reduce road kills?
Authors
KeywordsHighways
Bufo bufo
Rana esculenta
Rana dalmatina
Road kills
Choice tests
Amphibian tunnels
Issue Date2004
Citation
Oryx, 2004, v. 38, n. 2, p. 220-223 How to Cite?
AbstractIncreased traffic volumes worldwide are contributing to amphibian declines, and measures to reduce the occurrence of road kills are needed. One possible measure is the construction of underpasses through which animals can pass under roads, but little is known about whether amphibians will choose tunnels if given a choice or about their preferences for different tunnel types. We tested the preferences of three anuran species for two kinds of concrete amphibian tunnels currently used in France. One was a tunnel lined with soil, the other a bare concrete pipe. The animals could use the tunnels or bypass them over a grassy area. Water frogs Rana esculenta and common toads Bufo bufo showed a preference for the tunnels, whereas agile frogs Rana dalmatina avoided them. Among the individuals that chose either of the tunnels, all species showed a significant preference for the tunnel lined with soil. These results indicate that species differ in their preferences and in their likelihood of using underpasses when given a choice. This highlights the fact that there is no unique solution to the problem, and underpasses are only one of the possible mitigation measures that need to be assessed. © 2004 FFI.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292559
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.775
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLesbarrères, David-
dc.contributor.authorLodé, Thierry-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:56:44Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationOryx, 2004, v. 38, n. 2, p. 220-223-
dc.identifier.issn0030-6053-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292559-
dc.description.abstractIncreased traffic volumes worldwide are contributing to amphibian declines, and measures to reduce the occurrence of road kills are needed. One possible measure is the construction of underpasses through which animals can pass under roads, but little is known about whether amphibians will choose tunnels if given a choice or about their preferences for different tunnel types. We tested the preferences of three anuran species for two kinds of concrete amphibian tunnels currently used in France. One was a tunnel lined with soil, the other a bare concrete pipe. The animals could use the tunnels or bypass them over a grassy area. Water frogs Rana esculenta and common toads Bufo bufo showed a preference for the tunnels, whereas agile frogs Rana dalmatina avoided them. Among the individuals that chose either of the tunnels, all species showed a significant preference for the tunnel lined with soil. These results indicate that species differ in their preferences and in their likelihood of using underpasses when given a choice. This highlights the fact that there is no unique solution to the problem, and underpasses are only one of the possible mitigation measures that need to be assessed. © 2004 FFI.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofOryx-
dc.subjectHighways-
dc.subjectBufo bufo-
dc.subjectRana esculenta-
dc.subjectRana dalmatina-
dc.subjectRoad kills-
dc.subjectChoice tests-
dc.subjectAmphibian tunnels-
dc.titleWhat type of amphibian tunnel could reduce road kills?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0030605304000389-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-31344446152-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage220-
dc.identifier.epage223-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-3008-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000221639400025-
dc.identifier.issnl0030-6053-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats