File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Critical analysis of an accident and emergency ward

TitleCritical analysis of an accident and emergency ward
Authors
KeywordsObservation ward
Emergency medicine
Issue Date1996
Citation
Emergency Medicine Journal, 1996, v. 13, n. 5, p. 325-329 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives - To describe the work, both qualitatively and quantitatively, of an accident and emergency (A&E) ward, and discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with this ward. Methods - An observational study was carried out of all patients admitted to the A&E ward of Glasgow Royal Infirmary from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1992. Epidemiological and management data were collected for all patients admitted. Results - There were 2460 admissions, of which 69% were related to trauma and 45% to head injury; 47% of the patients had consumed alcohol before admission. Accidental trauma was the commonest reason for admission (57%), followed by assault (33%). Ninety two per cent of admissions stayed for less than 3 d, but 33% of the workload was spent on a small number of patients admitted for longer than 7 d. Conclusions - This A&E ward presents a significant workload, and some of its most serious problems lie with those patients who stay longer than 72 h. The safe and effective use of the ward depends upon it being well resourced, along with the department it serves.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292491
ISSN
PubMed Central ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRainer, T. H.-
dc.contributor.authorSwann, I. J.-
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:56:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:56:36Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.citationEmergency Medicine Journal, 1996, v. 13, n. 5, p. 325-329-
dc.identifier.issn1351-0622-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292491-
dc.description.abstractObjectives - To describe the work, both qualitatively and quantitatively, of an accident and emergency (A&E) ward, and discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with this ward. Methods - An observational study was carried out of all patients admitted to the A&E ward of Glasgow Royal Infirmary from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1992. Epidemiological and management data were collected for all patients admitted. Results - There were 2460 admissions, of which 69% were related to trauma and 45% to head injury; 47% of the patients had consumed alcohol before admission. Accidental trauma was the commonest reason for admission (57%), followed by assault (33%). Ninety two per cent of admissions stayed for less than 3 d, but 33% of the workload was spent on a small number of patients admitted for longer than 7 d. Conclusions - This A&E ward presents a significant workload, and some of its most serious problems lie with those patients who stay longer than 72 h. The safe and effective use of the ward depends upon it being well resourced, along with the department it serves.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEmergency Medicine Journal-
dc.subjectObservation ward-
dc.subjectEmergency medicine-
dc.titleCritical analysis of an accident and emergency ward-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emj.13.5.325-
dc.identifier.pmid8894857-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC1342765-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0029780437-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage325-
dc.identifier.epage329-
dc.identifier.issnl1351-0622-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats