File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/pchj.316
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85074787356
- PMID: 31692266
- WOS: WOS:000494550700001
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder
Title | Effort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | PsyCh Journal, 2020, v. 9, n. 2, p. 210-222 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Amotivational symptoms are observed in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Effort–cost computation may be a potential contributor to amotivation transdiagnostically. This study examined effort–cost computation in these three diagnostic groups. This study recruited 141 outpatients (49 SCZ, 52 non-psychotic BD, and 40 non-psychotic MDD) and 57 healthy controls (HCs). We administered the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), which manipulated different levels of reward magnitude and probability relating to a high and low physical effort task. There were significant interactions between group and reward magnitude, group and reward probability, and group and expected value on the percentage of high-effort choices. SCZ, BD, and MDD patients made comparably fewer high-effort choices than HCs in the high-reward magnitude, high-reward probability, and high-expected-value conditions. Self-reported amotivation did not correlate with decision-making on the EEfRT. Our findings suggest that reduced effort expenditure for reward is a transdiagnostic phenotype in SCZ, BD, and MDD. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292132 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zou, Ying Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ni, Ke | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yan Yu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, En Qing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lui, Simon S.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Fu Chun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Han Xue | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cohen, Alex S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Strauss, Gregory P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Eric F.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Raymond C.K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T14:55:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T14:55:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PsyCh Journal, 2020, v. 9, n. 2, p. 210-222 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292132 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Amotivational symptoms are observed in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Effort–cost computation may be a potential contributor to amotivation transdiagnostically. This study examined effort–cost computation in these three diagnostic groups. This study recruited 141 outpatients (49 SCZ, 52 non-psychotic BD, and 40 non-psychotic MDD) and 57 healthy controls (HCs). We administered the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), which manipulated different levels of reward magnitude and probability relating to a high and low physical effort task. There were significant interactions between group and reward magnitude, group and reward probability, and group and expected value on the percentage of high-effort choices. SCZ, BD, and MDD patients made comparably fewer high-effort choices than HCs in the high-reward magnitude, high-reward probability, and high-expected-value conditions. Self-reported amotivation did not correlate with decision-making on the EEfRT. Our findings suggest that reduced effort expenditure for reward is a transdiagnostic phenotype in SCZ, BD, and MDD. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | PsyCh Journal | - |
dc.title | Effort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/pchj.316 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31692266 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85074787356 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 319887 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 210 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 222 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2046-0260 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000494550700001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2046-0252 | - |