File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder

TitleEffort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder
Authors
Issue Date2020
Citation
PsyCh Journal, 2020, v. 9, n. 2, p. 210-222 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Amotivational symptoms are observed in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Effort–cost computation may be a potential contributor to amotivation transdiagnostically. This study examined effort–cost computation in these three diagnostic groups. This study recruited 141 outpatients (49 SCZ, 52 non-psychotic BD, and 40 non-psychotic MDD) and 57 healthy controls (HCs). We administered the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), which manipulated different levels of reward magnitude and probability relating to a high and low physical effort task. There were significant interactions between group and reward magnitude, group and reward probability, and group and expected value on the percentage of high-effort choices. SCZ, BD, and MDD patients made comparably fewer high-effort choices than HCs in the high-reward magnitude, high-reward probability, and high-expected-value conditions. Self-reported amotivation did not correlate with decision-making on the EEfRT. Our findings suggest that reduced effort expenditure for reward is a transdiagnostic phenotype in SCZ, BD, and MDD.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292132
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZou, Ying Min-
dc.contributor.authorNi, Ke-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yan Yu-
dc.contributor.authorYu, En Qing-
dc.contributor.authorLui, Simon S.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Fu Chun-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Han Xue-
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Alex S.-
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Gregory P.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Eric F.C.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond C.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPsyCh Journal, 2020, v. 9, n. 2, p. 210-222-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292132-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd Amotivational symptoms are observed in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Effort–cost computation may be a potential contributor to amotivation transdiagnostically. This study examined effort–cost computation in these three diagnostic groups. This study recruited 141 outpatients (49 SCZ, 52 non-psychotic BD, and 40 non-psychotic MDD) and 57 healthy controls (HCs). We administered the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), which manipulated different levels of reward magnitude and probability relating to a high and low physical effort task. There were significant interactions between group and reward magnitude, group and reward probability, and group and expected value on the percentage of high-effort choices. SCZ, BD, and MDD patients made comparably fewer high-effort choices than HCs in the high-reward magnitude, high-reward probability, and high-expected-value conditions. Self-reported amotivation did not correlate with decision-making on the EEfRT. Our findings suggest that reduced effort expenditure for reward is a transdiagnostic phenotype in SCZ, BD, and MDD.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPsyCh Journal-
dc.titleEffort–cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pchj.316-
dc.identifier.pmid31692266-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85074787356-
dc.identifier.hkuros319887-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage210-
dc.identifier.epage222-
dc.identifier.eissn2046-0260-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000494550700001-
dc.identifier.issnl2046-0252-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats