File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/pchj.281
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85074672297
- PMID: 30983167
- WOS: WOS:000499593700005
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting
Title | Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | affective empathy anhedonia cognitive empathy reliability validity |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | PsyCh Journal, 2019, v. 8, n. 4, p. 439-448 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a commonly used instrument in empathy research. However, this scale has not been validated in the Chinese context. We examined the psychometric properties and structure of the QCAE in a Chinese sample consisting of 1224 college students. The whole sample was split into two halves for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 617) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 607). A subsample (n = 351) completed the Chinese versions of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to examine convergent validity and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) to examine the discriminate validity. Finally, 79 participants of the above subsample were retested after a 4-week interval. Results from EFA and CFA suggested a five-factor model, namely Perspective Taking, Online Simulation, Emotional Contagion, Proximal Responsivity, and Peripheral Responsivity. The internal consistency was.86 and test–retest reliability was.76. Scores on the QCAE positively correlated with scores on the IRI and negatively correlated with scores on the RSAS. The Chinese version of the QCAE exhibited good factor structure, reliability, and validity. Specific relationships between empathy and social anhedonia were also demonstrated. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292131 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Yun Si | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Han Xue | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, Yan Tao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lui, Simon S.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Eric F.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Raymond C.K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T14:55:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T14:55:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PsyCh Journal, 2019, v. 8, n. 4, p. 439-448 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292131 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a commonly used instrument in empathy research. However, this scale has not been validated in the Chinese context. We examined the psychometric properties and structure of the QCAE in a Chinese sample consisting of 1224 college students. The whole sample was split into two halves for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 617) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 607). A subsample (n = 351) completed the Chinese versions of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to examine convergent validity and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) to examine the discriminate validity. Finally, 79 participants of the above subsample were retested after a 4-week interval. Results from EFA and CFA suggested a five-factor model, namely Perspective Taking, Online Simulation, Emotional Contagion, Proximal Responsivity, and Peripheral Responsivity. The internal consistency was.86 and test–retest reliability was.76. Scores on the QCAE positively correlated with scores on the IRI and negatively correlated with scores on the RSAS. The Chinese version of the QCAE exhibited good factor structure, reliability, and validity. Specific relationships between empathy and social anhedonia were also demonstrated. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | PsyCh Journal | - |
dc.subject | affective empathy | - |
dc.subject | anhedonia | - |
dc.subject | cognitive empathy | - |
dc.subject | reliability | - |
dc.subject | validity | - |
dc.title | Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/pchj.281 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30983167 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85074672297 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 319899 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 439 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 448 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2046-0260 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000499593700005 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2046-0252 | - |