File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/jfb.14071
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85068142926
- PMID: 31192469
- WOS: WOS:000508353600009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Aging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures
Title | Aging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | otolith Gasterosteus aculeatus gill cover pelvic spine repeatability age |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Journal of Fish Biology, 2019, v. 95, n. 3, p. 802-811 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2019 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles In order to assess the accuracy and reliability of age estimates from calcified structures in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus, we evaluated intra and inter-reader repeatability from three structures: otoliths, gill covers and pelvic spines). Average age estimates were also compared between the structures. The overall intra-reader repeatability of age estimates were highest for otoliths (69%), lowest for gill covers (53%) and intermediate for spine cross-sections (63%). Although four of the seven readers had the highest intra-reader repeatability score for spine cross-sections, the inter-reader variance in this structure was much higher than in others. Otoliths were the easiest in terms of their pre-analysis treatment and exchange of materials (as digital images) between readers. In addition, otoliths are more well-studied compared with the other structures with respect to their development through ontogenesis; hence, age estimates based on otoliths should be the most reliable. Therefore, our recommendation is that whenever possible, analysis of otoliths should be the preferred approach for aging G. aculeatus. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292117 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.553 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yurtseva, Anastasia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Noreikiene, Kristina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lajus, Dmitry | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Zitong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alapassi, Tarja | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ivanova, Tatiana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ivanov, Mikhail | - |
dc.contributor.author | Golovin, Pavel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vesala, Sami | - |
dc.contributor.author | Merilä, Juha | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T14:55:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T14:55:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Fish Biology, 2019, v. 95, n. 3, p. 802-811 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1112 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/292117 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles In order to assess the accuracy and reliability of age estimates from calcified structures in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus, we evaluated intra and inter-reader repeatability from three structures: otoliths, gill covers and pelvic spines). Average age estimates were also compared between the structures. The overall intra-reader repeatability of age estimates were highest for otoliths (69%), lowest for gill covers (53%) and intermediate for spine cross-sections (63%). Although four of the seven readers had the highest intra-reader repeatability score for spine cross-sections, the inter-reader variance in this structure was much higher than in others. Otoliths were the easiest in terms of their pre-analysis treatment and exchange of materials (as digital images) between readers. In addition, otoliths are more well-studied compared with the other structures with respect to their development through ontogenesis; hence, age estimates based on otoliths should be the most reliable. Therefore, our recommendation is that whenever possible, analysis of otoliths should be the preferred approach for aging G. aculeatus. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Fish Biology | - |
dc.subject | otolith | - |
dc.subject | Gasterosteus aculeatus | - |
dc.subject | gill cover | - |
dc.subject | pelvic spine | - |
dc.subject | repeatability | - |
dc.subject | age | - |
dc.title | Aging three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus: comparison of estimates from three structures | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jfb.14071 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31192469 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85068142926 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 95 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 802 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 811 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1095-8649 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000508353600009 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0022-1112 | - |