File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Traumatic liver injury in Hong Kong: The management strategy and outcome

TitleTraumatic liver injury in Hong Kong: The management strategy and outcome
Authors
KeywordsTreatment outcome
Nonpenetrating wounds
Abdominal injuries
Clinical protocols
Issue Date2009
Citation
Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009, v. 16, n. 4, p. 208-216 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Management of liver injury is challenging and evolving. The aim of this article is to review the outcome of traumatic liver injury in Chinese people in Hong Kong. Materials & methods: Records of 40 patients with hepatic injury who received treatment at the Prince of Wales Hospital between December 2000 and May 2005 were reviewed. Demographic data, severity of liver injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), haemodynamic status and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, investigations made, concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients were analysed. Results: There were 23 male and 17 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 (SD=15.4) years. Road traffic accident was the most common injury mechanism (65%). Half of the patients were treated by non-operative management (NOM). None of them required surgery during subsequent management. Patients in the operative management (OM) group had a significantly higher ISS (p=0.026), but there was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the OM and NOM groups. Patients with stable haemodynamic status and who were treated non-operatively had a significantly snorter hospital stay (p=0.006). High grade liver injury (OR=8.0, 95% CI=1.2 to 53.8, p=0.03) and ISS greater than 25 (OR=21.6, 95% CI=2.0 to 225.3, p=0.01) were independent risk factors for mortality on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Non-operative management of liver injury can be safely accomplished in haemodynamically stable patients, with the possible benefit of a shorter hospital stay.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291922
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.297
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChong, Ching Ning-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yue Sun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kit Fai-
dc.contributor.authorRainer, Timothy Hudson-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Bo San Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009, v. 16, n. 4, p. 208-216-
dc.identifier.issn1024-9079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291922-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Management of liver injury is challenging and evolving. The aim of this article is to review the outcome of traumatic liver injury in Chinese people in Hong Kong. Materials & methods: Records of 40 patients with hepatic injury who received treatment at the Prince of Wales Hospital between December 2000 and May 2005 were reviewed. Demographic data, severity of liver injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), haemodynamic status and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, investigations made, concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients were analysed. Results: There were 23 male and 17 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 (SD=15.4) years. Road traffic accident was the most common injury mechanism (65%). Half of the patients were treated by non-operative management (NOM). None of them required surgery during subsequent management. Patients in the operative management (OM) group had a significantly higher ISS (p=0.026), but there was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the OM and NOM groups. Patients with stable haemodynamic status and who were treated non-operatively had a significantly snorter hospital stay (p=0.006). High grade liver injury (OR=8.0, 95% CI=1.2 to 53.8, p=0.03) and ISS greater than 25 (OR=21.6, 95% CI=2.0 to 225.3, p=0.01) were independent risk factors for mortality on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Non-operative management of liver injury can be safely accomplished in haemodynamically stable patients, with the possible benefit of a shorter hospital stay.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine-
dc.subjectTreatment outcome-
dc.subjectNonpenetrating wounds-
dc.subjectAbdominal injuries-
dc.subjectClinical protocols-
dc.titleTraumatic liver injury in Hong Kong: The management strategy and outcome-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/102490790901600403-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70349866234-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage208-
dc.identifier.epage216-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000270215200003-
dc.identifier.issnl1024-9079-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats