File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Identifying footprints of directional and balancing selection in marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations

TitleIdentifying footprints of directional and balancing selection in marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations
Authors
KeywordsMicrosatellite
Hitchhiking
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Directional selection
Balancing selection
Genome scan
Issue Date2008
Citation
Molecular Ecology, 2008, v. 17, n. 15, p. 3565-3582 How to Cite?
AbstractNatural selection is expected to leave an imprint on the neutral polymorphisms at the adjacent genomic regions of a selected gene. While directional selection tends to reduce within-population genetic diversity and increase among-population differentiation, the reverse is expected under balancing selection. To identify targets of natural selection in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) genome, 103 microsatellite and two indel markers including expressed sequence tags (EST) and quantitative trait loci (QTL)-associated loci, were genotyped in four freshwater and three marine populations. The results indicated that a high proportion of loci (14.7%) might be affected by balancing selection and a lower proportion (2.8%) by directional selection. The strongest signatures of directional selection were detected in a microsatellite locus and two indel markers located in the intronic regions of the Eda-gene coding for the number of lateral plates. Yet, other microsatellite loci previously found to be informative in QTL-mapping studies revealed no signatures of selection. Two novel microsatellite loci (Stn12 and Stn90) located in chromosomes I and VIII, respectively, showed signals of directional selection and might be linked to genomic regions containing gene(s) important for adaptive divergence. Although the coverage of the total genomic content was relatively low, the predominance of balancing selection signals is in agreement with the contention that balancing, rather than directional selection is the predominant mode of selection in the wild. © 2008 The Authors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291841
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.705
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMäkinen, H. S.-
dc.contributor.authorCano, J. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:13Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Ecology, 2008, v. 17, n. 15, p. 3565-3582-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291841-
dc.description.abstractNatural selection is expected to leave an imprint on the neutral polymorphisms at the adjacent genomic regions of a selected gene. While directional selection tends to reduce within-population genetic diversity and increase among-population differentiation, the reverse is expected under balancing selection. To identify targets of natural selection in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) genome, 103 microsatellite and two indel markers including expressed sequence tags (EST) and quantitative trait loci (QTL)-associated loci, were genotyped in four freshwater and three marine populations. The results indicated that a high proportion of loci (14.7%) might be affected by balancing selection and a lower proportion (2.8%) by directional selection. The strongest signatures of directional selection were detected in a microsatellite locus and two indel markers located in the intronic regions of the Eda-gene coding for the number of lateral plates. Yet, other microsatellite loci previously found to be informative in QTL-mapping studies revealed no signatures of selection. Two novel microsatellite loci (Stn12 and Stn90) located in chromosomes I and VIII, respectively, showed signals of directional selection and might be linked to genomic regions containing gene(s) important for adaptive divergence. Although the coverage of the total genomic content was relatively low, the predominance of balancing selection signals is in agreement with the contention that balancing, rather than directional selection is the predominant mode of selection in the wild. © 2008 The Authors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology-
dc.subjectMicrosatellite-
dc.subjectHitchhiking-
dc.subjectGasterosteus aculeatus-
dc.subjectDirectional selection-
dc.subjectBalancing selection-
dc.subjectGenome scan-
dc.titleIdentifying footprints of directional and balancing selection in marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03714.x-
dc.identifier.pmid18312551-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-47649114360-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.identifier.spage3565-
dc.identifier.epage3582-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-294X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000257781300012-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-1083-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats