File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin?

TitleDo male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin?
Authors
KeywordsRelatedness
Kin selection
Lek
Amphibia
Rana arvalis
Issue Date2008
Citation
Molecular Ecology, 2008, v. 17, n. 10, p. 2522-2530 How to Cite?
AbstractMany amphibian species are known to form leks during breeding season, yet it has seldom been tested which evolutionary forces are likely to act on lek formation in this taxon. We tested the kin selection hypothesis for lek formation by using eight variable microsatellite loci to compare the genetic relationship of 203 males in seven Rana arvalis leks. The results indicate that moor frog males do not lek with kin: their relatedness within leks was not higher than expected by chance. Furthermore, spatially distinct leks within same water bodies could not be distinguished from each other as separate units. These results are not expected if kin selection underlie lek formation. On the basis of these results and general knowledge of anuran breeding biology, we suggest that lek formation in explosively breeding amphibians might have evolved by female choice for breeding aggregations, combined with female choice of habitat. Future work should aim at predicting aggregations based on rules of phonotaxis over different spatial scales, and empirical work should document visitation rates not only for leks of a specific size, but also for different travel distances that visiting females may have had to cover. © 2008 The Authors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291821
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.705
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnopp, T.-
dc.contributor.authorHeimovirta, M.-
dc.contributor.authorKokko, H.-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:11Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Ecology, 2008, v. 17, n. 10, p. 2522-2530-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291821-
dc.description.abstractMany amphibian species are known to form leks during breeding season, yet it has seldom been tested which evolutionary forces are likely to act on lek formation in this taxon. We tested the kin selection hypothesis for lek formation by using eight variable microsatellite loci to compare the genetic relationship of 203 males in seven Rana arvalis leks. The results indicate that moor frog males do not lek with kin: their relatedness within leks was not higher than expected by chance. Furthermore, spatially distinct leks within same water bodies could not be distinguished from each other as separate units. These results are not expected if kin selection underlie lek formation. On the basis of these results and general knowledge of anuran breeding biology, we suggest that lek formation in explosively breeding amphibians might have evolved by female choice for breeding aggregations, combined with female choice of habitat. Future work should aim at predicting aggregations based on rules of phonotaxis over different spatial scales, and empirical work should document visitation rates not only for leks of a specific size, but also for different travel distances that visiting females may have had to cover. © 2008 The Authors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology-
dc.subjectRelatedness-
dc.subjectKin selection-
dc.subjectLek-
dc.subjectAmphibia-
dc.subjectRana arvalis-
dc.titleDo male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03748.x-
dc.identifier.pmid18422930-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-43049149791-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage2522-
dc.identifier.epage2530-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-294X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000255464800015-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-1083-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats