File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1655/01-105
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-18144453354
- WOS: WOS:000185438400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Does jelly envelope protect the common frog Rana temporaria embryos from UV-B radiation?
Title | Does jelly envelope protect the common frog Rana temporaria embryos from UV-B radiation? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Rana temporaria Amphibians Jelly Envelope UV-B |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Citation | Herpetologica, 2003, v. 59, n. 3, p. 293-300 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Animals have evolved a number of ways to protect themselves from the harmful effects of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, but little is known about the relative importance of different mechanisms protecting amphibian embryos from UV-B radiation. Using enzymatic removal of gelatinous coats (jelly envelope) surrounding the eggs of Rana temporaria, we tested the hypothesis that the jelly envelope acts as a sunscreen that protects embryos from harmful effects of UV-B radiation. We conducted two independent factorial laboratory experiments employing three different UV-B (no UV-B, normal, and enhanced) levels and jelly removal (control, modified, and completely removed) treatments. We found no UV-B X jelly removed treatment interactions in survival rates or in frequency of abnormal individuals, suggesting that jelly removal did not increase susceptibility of embryos to UV-B radiation. These results support the contention that the jelly envelope is not the most important means of protecting B. temporaria embryos from UV-B radiation. Other factors (e.g., melanin pigments, other sunscreen compounds, effective DNA-repair mechanisms) must be responsible for the high UV-B radiation tolerance of embryos. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/291717 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.662 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Räsänen, Katja | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pahkala, Maarit | - |
dc.contributor.author | Laurila, Anssi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Merilä, Juha | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T14:54:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T14:54:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Herpetologica, 2003, v. 59, n. 3, p. 293-300 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-0831 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/291717 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Animals have evolved a number of ways to protect themselves from the harmful effects of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, but little is known about the relative importance of different mechanisms protecting amphibian embryos from UV-B radiation. Using enzymatic removal of gelatinous coats (jelly envelope) surrounding the eggs of Rana temporaria, we tested the hypothesis that the jelly envelope acts as a sunscreen that protects embryos from harmful effects of UV-B radiation. We conducted two independent factorial laboratory experiments employing three different UV-B (no UV-B, normal, and enhanced) levels and jelly removal (control, modified, and completely removed) treatments. We found no UV-B X jelly removed treatment interactions in survival rates or in frequency of abnormal individuals, suggesting that jelly removal did not increase susceptibility of embryos to UV-B radiation. These results support the contention that the jelly envelope is not the most important means of protecting B. temporaria embryos from UV-B radiation. Other factors (e.g., melanin pigments, other sunscreen compounds, effective DNA-repair mechanisms) must be responsible for the high UV-B radiation tolerance of embryos. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Herpetologica | - |
dc.subject | Rana temporaria | - |
dc.subject | Amphibians | - |
dc.subject | Jelly | - |
dc.subject | Envelope | - |
dc.subject | UV-B | - |
dc.title | Does jelly envelope protect the common frog Rana temporaria embryos from UV-B radiation? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1655/01-105 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-18144453354 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 59 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 293 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 300 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000185438400001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0018-0831 | - |