File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Genetic variation and causes of genotype-environment interaction in the body size of blue tit (Parus caeruleus)

TitleGenetic variation and causes of genotype-environment interaction in the body size of blue tit (Parus caeruleus)
Authors
Issue Date1998
Citation
Genetics, 1998, v. 148, n. 3, p. 1233-1244 How to Cite?
AbstractIn several studies of natural populations of birds, the heritability of body size estimated by parent-offspring regression has been lower when offspring have developed in poor feeding regimens than when they developed in good feeding regimens. This has led to the suggestion that adaptation under poor regimens may be constrained by lack of genetic variation. We examined the influence of environmental conditions on expression of genetic variation ill body size of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus) by raising full sibs in artificially reduced and enlarged broods, corresponding to good and poor feeding regimens, respectively. Individuals grown in the poor regimen attained smaller body size trail their sibs grown in the good regimen. However, there was among-family variation in response to the treatments - i.e., genotype-environment interactions (GEIs). Partitioning the GEl variance into contributions attributable to (1) differences in the among-Family genetic variance between the treatments and (2) imperfect correlation of genotypic values across treatments identified the latter as the main cause of the GEl. Parent-offspring regressions were not significantly different when offspring were reared in the good environment (h2 = 0.75) vs. when they were reared in the poor environment (h2 = 0.63). Thus, there was little evidence that genetic variance in body size was lower under the poor conditions than trader the good conditions. These results do not support the view that the genetic potential for adaptation to poor feeding conditions is less than that for adaptation to good conditions, but they do suggest that different genotypes may be favored under the different conditions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291449
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.917
PubMed Central ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.contributor.authorFry, James D.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationGenetics, 1998, v. 148, n. 3, p. 1233-1244-
dc.identifier.issn0016-6731-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291449-
dc.description.abstractIn several studies of natural populations of birds, the heritability of body size estimated by parent-offspring regression has been lower when offspring have developed in poor feeding regimens than when they developed in good feeding regimens. This has led to the suggestion that adaptation under poor regimens may be constrained by lack of genetic variation. We examined the influence of environmental conditions on expression of genetic variation ill body size of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus) by raising full sibs in artificially reduced and enlarged broods, corresponding to good and poor feeding regimens, respectively. Individuals grown in the poor regimen attained smaller body size trail their sibs grown in the good regimen. However, there was among-family variation in response to the treatments - i.e., genotype-environment interactions (GEIs). Partitioning the GEl variance into contributions attributable to (1) differences in the among-Family genetic variance between the treatments and (2) imperfect correlation of genotypic values across treatments identified the latter as the main cause of the GEl. Parent-offspring regressions were not significantly different when offspring were reared in the good environment (h2 = 0.75) vs. when they were reared in the poor environment (h2 = 0.63). Thus, there was little evidence that genetic variance in body size was lower under the poor conditions than trader the good conditions. These results do not support the view that the genetic potential for adaptation to poor feeding conditions is less than that for adaptation to good conditions, but they do suggest that different genotypes may be favored under the different conditions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGenetics-
dc.titleGenetic variation and causes of genotype-environment interaction in the body size of blue tit (Parus caeruleus)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid9539438-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC1460023-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0031972434-
dc.identifier.volume148-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage1233-
dc.identifier.epage1244-
dc.identifier.issnl0016-6731-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats