File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Genetic variation in offspring condition: An experiment

TitleGenetic variation in offspring condition: An experiment
Authors
Keywordsheritability
Body condition
Ficedula albicollis
genetic variance
Issue Date1996
Citation
Functional Ecology, 1996, v. 10, n. 4, p. 465-474 How to Cite?
Abstract1. Body condition, reflecting size of the subcutaneous fat reserves at the end of the nestling period, is a good predictor of subsequent survival in nestling passerines. While the condition has traditionally been viewed as a highly plastic trait reflecting the nutritional state of individuals determined by the quality of parental care, nothing is known about the genetics of this trait. 2. The heritability and underlying genetic, environmental and genotype-by-environment interaction components of variation in nestling body condition were estimated in the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. To distinguish between genetic and environmental causes of resemblance, a reciprocal split-brood design was applied where full-sibs were reared apart in two different experimentally created environments. 3. Nestlings reared in enlarged broods were in poorer condition than their full-sibs raised in reduced broods, indicating a large environmental component to phenotypic variation in body condition. 4. However, there was a significant additive genetic component to variation in body condition in all environments, but no evidence for genotype-environment interactions. As found earlier for life-history traits closely related with fitness, heritability estimates (in both experimental environments) were generally low (h2 ≃ 0.30) and sometimes not significantly different from zero. 5. These results suggest that environmental influences, e.g. amount and quality of received food, are major determinants of offspring condition. However, the small but significant additive genetic component suggests that there are also inherited differences in offspring viability and survival potential.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291383
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.282
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.272
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.citationFunctional Ecology, 1996, v. 10, n. 4, p. 465-474-
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291383-
dc.description.abstract1. Body condition, reflecting size of the subcutaneous fat reserves at the end of the nestling period, is a good predictor of subsequent survival in nestling passerines. While the condition has traditionally been viewed as a highly plastic trait reflecting the nutritional state of individuals determined by the quality of parental care, nothing is known about the genetics of this trait. 2. The heritability and underlying genetic, environmental and genotype-by-environment interaction components of variation in nestling body condition were estimated in the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. To distinguish between genetic and environmental causes of resemblance, a reciprocal split-brood design was applied where full-sibs were reared apart in two different experimentally created environments. 3. Nestlings reared in enlarged broods were in poorer condition than their full-sibs raised in reduced broods, indicating a large environmental component to phenotypic variation in body condition. 4. However, there was a significant additive genetic component to variation in body condition in all environments, but no evidence for genotype-environment interactions. As found earlier for life-history traits closely related with fitness, heritability estimates (in both experimental environments) were generally low (h2 ≃ 0.30) and sometimes not significantly different from zero. 5. These results suggest that environmental influences, e.g. amount and quality of received food, are major determinants of offspring condition. However, the small but significant additive genetic component suggests that there are also inherited differences in offspring viability and survival potential.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofFunctional Ecology-
dc.subjectheritability-
dc.subjectBody condition-
dc.subjectFicedula albicollis-
dc.subjectgenetic variance-
dc.titleGenetic variation in offspring condition: An experiment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/2389939-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0030304593-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage465-
dc.identifier.epage474-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1996VN66800006-
dc.identifier.issnl0269-8463-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats