File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Matched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy

TitleMatched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy
Authors
KeywordsBreast cancer
older chinese patients
surgery
primary endocrine therapy
case-control matching
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications
Citation
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2020, v. 25, p. article no. 100227 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Primary endocrine therapy (PET) has been used as an alternative to primary surgery for elderly with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors. Such practices are less commonly performed in Asian countries and the response to PET in Chinese cohort is still lacking. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of PET to primary surgery. Patients and Methods: Medical records of Chinese patients aged 70 and above with stage I to III, ER positive breast cancer treated at a University affiliated tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one case-control survival analysis of patients treated with PET or primary operation was performed, using propensity score case-match analysis to adjust for confounding factors. Results: 292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. 209 patients received primary operation, whereas 83 patients received PET. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one matching was performed, and the dataset was stratified into survival time within 0–5 years and beyond 5 years. Both groups had similar survival within 0–5 years (p = 0.63). The survival curves diverged beyond 5 years, with a significantly better outcome in patients operated than those treated with PET (p = 0.0029). Conclusions: For frail older patients with limited life expectancy, PET may be appropriate since equivalent survival can be achieved for PET with or without surgery. Those patients with longer life expectancy may gain survival benefits from local treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is useful to predict the survival probability and guide the optimal treatment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290679
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.793

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuen, TKD-
dc.contributor.authorLuk, WP-
dc.contributor.authorFung, LH-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T05:45:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T05:45:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2020, v. 25, p. article no. 100227-
dc.identifier.issn2468-2942-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290679-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Primary endocrine therapy (PET) has been used as an alternative to primary surgery for elderly with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors. Such practices are less commonly performed in Asian countries and the response to PET in Chinese cohort is still lacking. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of PET to primary surgery. Patients and Methods: Medical records of Chinese patients aged 70 and above with stage I to III, ER positive breast cancer treated at a University affiliated tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one case-control survival analysis of patients treated with PET or primary operation was performed, using propensity score case-match analysis to adjust for confounding factors. Results: 292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. 209 patients received primary operation, whereas 83 patients received PET. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one matching was performed, and the dataset was stratified into survival time within 0–5 years and beyond 5 years. Both groups had similar survival within 0–5 years (p = 0.63). The survival curves diverged beyond 5 years, with a significantly better outcome in patients operated than those treated with PET (p = 0.0029). Conclusions: For frail older patients with limited life expectancy, PET may be appropriate since equivalent survival can be achieved for PET with or without surgery. Those patients with longer life expectancy may gain survival benefits from local treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is useful to predict the survival probability and guide the optimal treatment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications-
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Treatment and Research Communications-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBreast cancer-
dc.subjectolder chinese patients-
dc.subjectsurgery-
dc.subjectprimary endocrine therapy-
dc.subjectcase-control matching-
dc.titleMatched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSuen, TKD: suentkd@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLuk, WP: lukeluk@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailKwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwong, A=rp01734-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100227-
dc.identifier.pmid33120314-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85094127901-
dc.identifier.hkuros318513-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 100227-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 100227-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl2468-2942-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats