File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100227
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85094127901
- PMID: 33120314
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Matched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy
Title | Matched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Breast cancer older chinese patients surgery primary endocrine therapy case-control matching |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications |
Citation | Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2020, v. 25, p. article no. 100227 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background:
Primary endocrine therapy (PET) has been used as an alternative to primary surgery for elderly with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors. Such practices are less commonly performed in Asian countries and the response to PET in Chinese cohort is still lacking. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of PET to primary surgery.
Patients and Methods:
Medical records of Chinese patients aged 70 and above with stage I to III, ER positive breast cancer treated at a University affiliated tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one case-control survival analysis of patients treated with PET or primary operation was performed, using propensity score case-match analysis to adjust for confounding factors.
Results:
292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. 209 patients received primary operation, whereas 83 patients received PET. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one matching was performed, and the dataset was stratified into survival time within 0–5 years and beyond 5 years. Both groups had similar survival within 0–5 years (p = 0.63). The survival curves diverged beyond 5 years, with a significantly better outcome in patients operated than those treated with PET (p = 0.0029).
Conclusions:
For frail older patients with limited life expectancy, PET may be appropriate since equivalent survival can be achieved for PET with or without surgery. Those patients with longer life expectancy may gain survival benefits from local treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is useful to predict the survival probability and guide the optimal treatment. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/290679 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.793 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Suen, TKD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Luk, WP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fung, LH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwong, A | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-02T05:45:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-02T05:45:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2020, v. 25, p. article no. 100227 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2468-2942 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/290679 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Primary endocrine therapy (PET) has been used as an alternative to primary surgery for elderly with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast tumors. Such practices are less commonly performed in Asian countries and the response to PET in Chinese cohort is still lacking. This study aims to compare the clinical outcome of PET to primary surgery. Patients and Methods: Medical records of Chinese patients aged 70 and above with stage I to III, ER positive breast cancer treated at a University affiliated tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one case-control survival analysis of patients treated with PET or primary operation was performed, using propensity score case-match analysis to adjust for confounding factors. Results: 292 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period. 209 patients received primary operation, whereas 83 patients received PET. Excluding those with extreme comorbidity, a one-to-one matching was performed, and the dataset was stratified into survival time within 0–5 years and beyond 5 years. Both groups had similar survival within 0–5 years (p = 0.63). The survival curves diverged beyond 5 years, with a significantly better outcome in patients operated than those treated with PET (p = 0.0029). Conclusions: For frail older patients with limited life expectancy, PET may be appropriate since equivalent survival can be achieved for PET with or without surgery. Those patients with longer life expectancy may gain survival benefits from local treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is useful to predict the survival probability and guide the optimal treatment. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cancer-treatment-and-research-communications | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cancer Treatment and Research Communications | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Breast cancer | - |
dc.subject | older chinese patients | - |
dc.subject | surgery | - |
dc.subject | primary endocrine therapy | - |
dc.subject | case-control matching | - |
dc.title | Matched case-control survival analysis of older chinese breast cancer patients treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Suen, TKD: suentkd@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Luk, WP: lukeluk@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Kwong, A: avakwong@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Kwong, A=rp01734 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100227 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33120314 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85094127901 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 318513 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 100227 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 100227 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2468-2942 | - |