File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization

TitleThe state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization
Authors
KeywordsState project
crisis management
state-led financialization
shantytown redevelopment schemes
securitization
Issue Date2020
PublisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/environment-and-planning-a/journal202436
Citation
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, v. 52 n. 3, p. 632-653 How to Cite?
AbstractSince 2008, China has introduced state-led financialization to inject low-interest, stable and long-term loans to facilitate urban redevelopment through national shantytown redevelopment schemes (SRSs). Extending critical state theories to China’s transitional economy, we consider SRSs to be a policy model of the state project (mode of policy-making) of crisis management that aims to revitalize the national economy in the wake of the global financial crisis. Essentially, this state project serves to tackle the legitimation crisis threatened by both the economic crisis and the escalating social discontent. Drawing on an empirical study of Chengdu, a regional hub in western China spearheading SRSs, this paper examines how the Chinese state at different levels interacts with the nascent financial market in the creation of a new “model” of urban redevelopment under state-led financialization. Having been exploited to manage economic and legitimation crises, this model has simultaneously become a source of “crisis of crisis-management” owing to the state’s “over-intervention”. This research contributes to a fresh understanding of the multiplicity of financialization by linking the financialization of urban built environment with the financialization of the state project, in which financial motives and practices shape the mode of policy making. The Chinese experience also presents a decentered interpretation of state-led financialization that renews our understanding of the multifaceted state and state projects, particularly the hybridized, often contradictory motivations and socio-economic outcomes of state interventions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290282
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.790
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.740
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, S-
dc.contributor.authorZHANG, M-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:24:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, v. 52 n. 3, p. 632-653-
dc.identifier.issn0308-518X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290282-
dc.description.abstractSince 2008, China has introduced state-led financialization to inject low-interest, stable and long-term loans to facilitate urban redevelopment through national shantytown redevelopment schemes (SRSs). Extending critical state theories to China’s transitional economy, we consider SRSs to be a policy model of the state project (mode of policy-making) of crisis management that aims to revitalize the national economy in the wake of the global financial crisis. Essentially, this state project serves to tackle the legitimation crisis threatened by both the economic crisis and the escalating social discontent. Drawing on an empirical study of Chengdu, a regional hub in western China spearheading SRSs, this paper examines how the Chinese state at different levels interacts with the nascent financial market in the creation of a new “model” of urban redevelopment under state-led financialization. Having been exploited to manage economic and legitimation crises, this model has simultaneously become a source of “crisis of crisis-management” owing to the state’s “over-intervention”. This research contributes to a fresh understanding of the multiplicity of financialization by linking the financialization of urban built environment with the financialization of the state project, in which financial motives and practices shape the mode of policy making. The Chinese experience also presents a decentered interpretation of state-led financialization that renews our understanding of the multifaceted state and state projects, particularly the hybridized, often contradictory motivations and socio-economic outcomes of state interventions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/environment-and-planning-a/journal202436-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space-
dc.rightsAuthor(s), Contribution Title, Journal Title (Journal Volume Number and Issue Number) pp. xx-xx. Copyright © [year] (Copyright Holder). DOI: [DOI number].-
dc.subjectState project-
dc.subjectcrisis management-
dc.subjectstate-led financialization-
dc.subjectshantytown redevelopment schemes-
dc.subjectsecuritization-
dc.titleThe state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHe, S: sjhe@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHe, S=rp01996-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0308518X19882427-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85076562377-
dc.identifier.hkuros316167-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage632-
dc.identifier.epage653-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000491606900001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0308-518X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats