File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.004
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85030678698
- PMID: 28966068
- WOS: WOS:000424716400002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study
Title | Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy mandibular setback stability cephalometric analysis |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom |
Citation | International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2018, v. 47 n. 2, p. 152-159 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study aimed to investigate the postoperative longitudinal skeletal changes and stability following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies (IVRO) for orthognathic mandibular setback, and the possible risk factors that might affect the stability. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed for the predictor (magnitude of setback and adjunctive procedures) and outcome (stability of vertical and horizontal dimensions) variables at six time points. A total of 152 patients (mean age 24.2 years) were included in the study. Following IVRO, the mandible measured at B-point had moved a mean 0.50 mm posteriorly at 1 week after the removal of intermaxillary fixation (7 weeks postoperative); this was followed by progressive small anterior relapse. At 2 years postoperative, the mean relapse of the mandible after IVRO measured at B-point was 0.05 mm (standard deviation 1.14 mm), representing 0.7% of the mean surgical movement. Large setback (>8 mm) showed significantly higher relapse compared to small setback (<4 mm) at 2 years after surgery ( P = 0.021). Patients who underwent adjunctive mandibular surgeries other than IVRO showed no significant differences in relapse compared to those who underwent IVRO alone. In conclusion, IVRO for mandibular setback is a stable procedure in the long term, with small relapse of 0.05 mm after 2 years. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289640 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.875 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kung, AYH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, YY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-22T08:15:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-22T08:15:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2018, v. 47 n. 2, p. 152-159 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0901-5027 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289640 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to investigate the postoperative longitudinal skeletal changes and stability following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies (IVRO) for orthognathic mandibular setback, and the possible risk factors that might affect the stability. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed for the predictor (magnitude of setback and adjunctive procedures) and outcome (stability of vertical and horizontal dimensions) variables at six time points. A total of 152 patients (mean age 24.2 years) were included in the study. Following IVRO, the mandible measured at B-point had moved a mean 0.50 mm posteriorly at 1 week after the removal of intermaxillary fixation (7 weeks postoperative); this was followed by progressive small anterior relapse. At 2 years postoperative, the mean relapse of the mandible after IVRO measured at B-point was 0.05 mm (standard deviation 1.14 mm), representing 0.7% of the mean surgical movement. Large setback (>8 mm) showed significantly higher relapse compared to small setback (<4 mm) at 2 years after surgery ( P = 0.021). Patients who underwent adjunctive mandibular surgeries other than IVRO showed no significant differences in relapse compared to those who underwent IVRO alone. In conclusion, IVRO for mandibular setback is a stable procedure in the long term, with small relapse of 0.05 mm after 2 years. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | - |
dc.subject | intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy | - |
dc.subject | mandibular setback | - |
dc.subject | stability | - |
dc.subject | cephalometric analysis | - |
dc.title | Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, YY: mleung04@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, YY=rp01522 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.004 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28966068 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85030678698 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 316490 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 47 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 152 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 159 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000424716400002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0901-5027 | - |