File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: EACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): Evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity

TitleEACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): Evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity
Authors
KeywordsAssessment
Reading difficulties
School children
Latent class analysis
Validation
Issue Date2012
Citation
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2012, v. 8, p. 443-454 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). Samples: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled "SP-screening" and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled "SP-trial" and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). Methods: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students' scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. Results: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. Conclusion: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills. © 2012 Cogo-Moreira et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289018
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 2.154
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.819
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCogo-Moreira, Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorPloubidis, George B.-
dc.contributor.authorde Ávila, Clara Regina Brandão-
dc.contributor.authorMari, Jair de Jesus-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Angela Maria Vieira-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:06:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:06:28Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2012, v. 8, p. 443-454-
dc.identifier.issn1176-6328-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289018-
dc.description.abstractAim: The study aimed to provide information about the concurrent and discriminant validation of the Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher (EACOL), which is composed of 27 dichotomous items concerning reading aloud (17 items) and reading silently (10 items). Samples: Three samples were used in this validation study. The first was composed of 335 students with an average age of 9.75 years (SD = 1.2) from Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais State), Brazil, where the full spectrum of reading ability was assessed. The second two samples were from São Paulo city (São Paulo State), Brazil, where only children with reading difficulties were recruited. The first São Paulo sample was labeled "SP-screening" and had n = 617, with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD = 1.0), and the other sample was labeled "SP-trial" and had n = 235, with a mean age of 9.15 years (SD = 0.05). Methods: Results were obtained from a latent class analysis LCA, in which two latent groups were obtained as solutions, and were correlated with direct reading measures. Also, students' scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire tested the discriminant validation. Results: Latent groups of readers underlying the EACOL predicted all direct reading measures, while the same latent groups showed no association with behavior and intelligence assessments, giving concurrent and discriminant validity to EACOL, respectively. Conclusion: EACOL is a reliable screening tool which can be used by a wide range of professionals for assessing reading skills. © 2012 Cogo-Moreira et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAssessment-
dc.subjectReading difficulties-
dc.subjectSchool children-
dc.subjectLatent class analysis-
dc.subjectValidation-
dc.titleEACOL (Scale of Evaluation of Reading Competence by the Teacher): Evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/NDT.S36196-
dc.identifier.pmid23091388-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3471598-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84868118494-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.spage443-
dc.identifier.epage454-
dc.identifier.eissn1178-2021-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000309656800001-
dc.identifier.issnl1176-6328-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats