File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Motor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2

TitleMotor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2
Authors
KeywordsBruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency
Motor skills
Evaluation report
Movement Assessment Battery for Children
Second Edition
Psychometrics
Issue Date2019
Citation
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 51-59 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019, Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul. All rights reserved. Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: N = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: N = 58, 45.67%). Results: The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor. Conclusions: The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288942
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkuda, Paola Matiko Martins-
dc.contributor.authorPangelinan, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorCapellini, Simone A.-
dc.contributor.authorCogo-Moreira, Hugo-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:06:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:06:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationTrends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 51-59-
dc.identifier.issn2237-6089-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288942-
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul. All rights reserved. Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: N = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: N = 58, 45.67%). Results: The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor. Conclusions: The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTrends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-
dc.subjectMotor skills-
dc.subjectEvaluation report-
dc.subjectMovement Assessment Battery for Children-
dc.subjectSecond Edition-
dc.subjectPsychometrics-
dc.titleMotor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014-
dc.identifier.pmid30942266-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85064993010-
dc.identifier.volume41-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage51-
dc.identifier.epage59-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000496732700007-
dc.identifier.issnl2237-6089-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats